* [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
@ 2026-03-11 13:23 Usama Arif
2026-03-11 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Usama Arif @ 2026-03-11 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton, npache, david, ziy, willy, linux-mm
Cc: matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul,
gourry, ying.huang, apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team,
Usama Arif
folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
never gets large_rmappable set.
This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
early because large_rmappable is not set:
if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
return false;
This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
+ if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
+ folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
+
mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
--
2.52.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 13:23 [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags() Usama Arif
@ 2026-03-11 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Zi Yan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-03-11 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif, Andrew Morton, npache, ziy, willy, linux-mm
Cc: matthew.brost, joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul,
gourry, ying.huang, apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 3/11/26 14:23, Usama Arif wrote:
> folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
> during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
>
> Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
> alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
> wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
> never gets large_rmappable set.
>
> This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
> migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
> via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
> when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
> early because large_rmappable is not set:
>
> if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
> return false;
>
> This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
> use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
>
> Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
> consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
>
> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
> folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
> pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
>
> + if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
> + folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
> +
> mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
code.
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
@ 2026-03-11 13:38 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-11 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Zi Yan @ 2026-03-11 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Cc: Usama Arif, Andrew Morton, npache, willy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 11 Mar 2026, at 9:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 3/11/26 14:23, Usama Arif wrote:
>> folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
>> during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
>>
>> Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
>> alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
>> wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
>> never gets large_rmappable set.
>>
>> This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
>> migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
>> via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
>> when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
>> early because large_rmappable is not set:
>>
>> if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>> return false;
>>
>> This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
>> use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
>>
>> Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
>> consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
>>
>> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
>> folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
>> pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
>>
>> + if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>> + folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
>> +
>> mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
>
> compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
>
> I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
>
> It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
> code.
I agree. The migration allocation function needs to give a folio or other
types of page matching the original one. Do we want to turn this into
a WARN to make sure newfolio matches folio's large_rmappable state?
--
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Zi Yan
@ 2026-03-11 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-03-11 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan
Cc: Usama Arif, Andrew Morton, npache, willy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 3/11/26 14:38, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2026, at 9:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/26 14:23, Usama Arif wrote:
>>> folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
>>> during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
>>>
>>> Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
>>> alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
>>> wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
>>> never gets large_rmappable set.
>>>
>>> This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
>>> migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
>>> via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
>>> when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
>>> early because large_rmappable is not set:
>>>
>>> if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>> return false;
>>>
>>> This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
>>> use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
>>>
>>> Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
>>> consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>> mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
>>> folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
>>> pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
>>>
>>> + if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>> + folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
>>> +
>>> mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
>>
>> compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
>>
>> I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
>>
>> It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
>> code.
>
> I agree. The migration allocation function needs to give a folio or other
> types of page matching the original one. Do we want to turn this into
> a WARN to make sure newfolio matches folio's large_rmappable state?
VM_WARN, sounds reasonable.
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-11 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
@ 2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:28 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Usama Arif @ 2026-03-11 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan, David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, willy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 11/03/2026 16:38, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 11 Mar 2026, at 9:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>
>> On 3/11/26 14:23, Usama Arif wrote:
>>> folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
>>> during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
>>>
>>> Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
>>> alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
>>> wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
>>> never gets large_rmappable set.
>>>
>>> This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
>>> migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
>>> via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
>>> when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
>>> early because large_rmappable is not set:
>>>
>>> if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>> return false;
>>>
>>> This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
>>> use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
>>>
>>> Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
>>> consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>>> ---
>>> mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
>>> folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
>>> pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
>>>
>>> + if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>> + folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
>>> +
>>> mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
>>> }
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
>>
>> compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
>>
>> I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
>>
>> It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
>> code.
>
> I agree. The migration allocation function needs to give a folio or other
> types of page matching the original one. Do we want to turn this into
> a WARN to make sure newfolio matches folio's large_rmappable state?
>
hmm its done in compaction_alloc() and alloc_migration_target_by_mpol() but I
dont see this being done in alloc_migration_target() and alloc_misplaced_dst_folio().
I think alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() is used by NUMA balancing and alloc_migration_target()
by hotplug and memory failure?
I am not very familiar with migration code, so maybe I am missing where its being done
in these paths?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
@ 2026-03-11 14:28 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Usama Arif @ 2026-03-11 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zi Yan, David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, willy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 11/03/2026 17:24, Usama Arif wrote:
>
>
> On 11/03/2026 16:38, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2026, at 9:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/11/26 14:23, Usama Arif wrote:
>>>> folio_migrate_flags() transfers folio state from source to destination
>>>> during migration, but does not transfer the large_rmappable flag.
>>>>
>>>> Migration allocators like alloc_migration_target() and
>>>> alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() use __folio_alloc() directly without
>>>> wrapping the result in page_rmappable_folio(), so the destination folio
>>>> never gets large_rmappable set.
>>>>
>>>> This becomes a problem when a folio on the deferred split queue is
>>>> migrated: the destination folio can be added to the deferred split queue
>>>> via deferred_split_folio() (which does not check large_rmappable), but
>>>> when the folio is later freed, folio_unqueue_deferred_split() bails out
>>>> early because large_rmappable is not set:
>>>>
>>>> if (folio_order(folio) <= 1 || !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>>> return false;
>>>>
>>>> This leaves a stale entry on the deferred split queue, leading to
>>>> use-after-free when the shrinker walks the list.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by transferring large_rmappable in folio_migrate_flags(),
>>>> consistent with how all other folio flags are handled.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/migrate.c | 3 +++
>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>>> index 3380021fd3db..ee1c7bc851dd 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>>> @@ -846,6 +846,9 @@ void folio_migrate_flags(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio)
>>>> folio_copy_owner(newfolio, folio);
>>>> pgalloc_tag_swap(newfolio, folio);
>>>>
>>>> + if (folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))
>>>> + folio_set_large_rmappable(newfolio);
>>>> +
>>>> mem_cgroup_migrate(folio, newfolio);
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(folio_migrate_flags);
>>>
>>> compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
>>>
>>> I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
>>>
>>> It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
>>> code.
>>
>> I agree. The migration allocation function needs to give a folio or other
>> types of page matching the original one. Do we want to turn this into
>> a WARN to make sure newfolio matches folio's large_rmappable state?
>>
>
> hmm its done in compaction_alloc() and alloc_migration_target_by_mpol() but I
> dont see this being done in alloc_migration_target() and alloc_misplaced_dst_folio().
> I think alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() is used by NUMA balancing and alloc_migration_target()
> by hotplug and memory failure?
>
> I am not very familiar with migration code, so maybe I am missing where its being done
> in these paths?
ah no ignore me :) __folio_alloc_noprof should set it. Thanks and sorry for the noise!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags()
2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:28 ` Usama Arif
@ 2026-03-11 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Hildenbrand (Arm) @ 2026-03-11 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Usama Arif, Zi Yan
Cc: Andrew Morton, npache, willy, linux-mm, matthew.brost,
joshua.hahnjy, hannes, rakie.kim, byungchul, gourry, ying.huang,
apopple, linux-kernel, kernel-team
On 3/11/26 15:24, Usama Arif wrote:
>
>
> On 11/03/2026 16:38, Zi Yan wrote:
>> On 11 Mar 2026, at 9:33, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> compaction_alloc_noprof() does the page_rmappable_folio() at the end.
>>>
>>> I'd assume that all migration allocation functions must take care of that.
>>>
>>> It's a responsibility of the folio allocation code, not folio migration
>>> code.
>>
>> I agree. The migration allocation function needs to give a folio or other
>> types of page matching the original one. Do we want to turn this into
>> a WARN to make sure newfolio matches folio's large_rmappable state?
>>
>
> hmm its done in compaction_alloc() and alloc_migration_target_by_mpol() but I
> dont see this being done in alloc_migration_target() and alloc_misplaced_dst_folio().
__folio_alloc_node() and friends should be calling
page_rmappable_folio(). See __folio_alloc_noprof().
> I think alloc_misplaced_dst_folio() is used by NUMA balancing and alloc_migration_target()
> by hotplug and memory failure?
>
> I am not very familiar with migration code, so maybe I am missing where its being done
> in these paths?
Please double check. If a call is missing, we should fix it there.
--
Cheers,
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-11 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-11 13:23 [PATCH] mm: migrate: transfer large_rmappable flag in folio_migrate_flags() Usama Arif
2026-03-11 13:33 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-11 13:38 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-11 13:57 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-03-11 14:24 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:28 ` Usama Arif
2026-03-11 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox