From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@infradead.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"kunit-dev@googlegroups.com" <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 9/9] iov_iter: Add benchmarking kunit tests for UBUF/IOVEC
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:23:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3449352.1694776980@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5017b9fa177f4deaa5d481a5d8914ab4@AcuMS.aculab.com>
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> wrote:
> > > Some measurements can be made using readv() and writev()
> > > on /dev/zero and /dev/null.
> >
> > Forget /dev/null; that doesn't actually engage any iteration code. The same
> > for writing to /dev/zero. Reading from /dev/zero does its own iteration thing
> > rather than using iterate_and_advance(), presumably because it checks for
> > signals and resched.
>
> Using /dev/null does exercise the 'copy iov from user' code.
Ummm.... Not really:
static ssize_t read_null(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
return 0;
}
static ssize_t write_null(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
return count;
}
static ssize_t read_iter_null(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
{
return 0;
}
static ssize_t write_iter_null(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
{
size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
iov_iter_advance(from, count);
return count;
}
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-15 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-14 22:15 [RFC PATCH 0/9] iov_iter: kunit: Cleanup, abstraction and more tests David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] iov_iter: Fix some checkpatch complaints in kunit tests David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] iov_iter: Consolidate some of the repeated code into helpers David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] iov_iter: Consolidate the test vector struct in the kunit tests David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] iov_iter: Consolidate bvec pattern checking David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] iov_iter: Create a function to prepare userspace VM for UBUF/IOVEC tests David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] iov_iter: Add copy kunit tests for ITER_UBUF and ITER_IOVEC David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] iov_iter: Add extract " David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] iov_iter: Add benchmarking kunit tests David Howells
2023-09-14 22:15 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] iov_iter: Add benchmarking kunit tests for UBUF/IOVEC David Howells
2023-09-15 7:09 ` David Laight
2023-09-15 10:10 ` David Howells
2023-09-15 10:51 ` David Laight
2023-09-15 11:23 ` David Howells [this message]
2023-09-15 12:10 ` David Laight
2023-09-15 12:36 ` David Howells
2023-09-15 13:08 ` David Laight
2023-09-15 13:24 ` David Howells
2023-09-15 12:19 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3449352.1694776980@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).