From: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
To: sxwjean@me.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/slub: Simplify get_partial_node()
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 23:22:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38beee7c-aceb-4d59-ac79-e7e412a01588@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240312140532.64124-1-sxwjean@me.com>
On 2024/3/12 22:05, sxwjean@me.com wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
>
> Remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() because it is always
> false, we've known this by calling kmem_cache_debug() before calling
> remove_partial(), so we can remove the check.
>
> Meanwhile, redo filling cpu partial and add comment to improve the
> readability.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Use "#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL)" to instead
> "if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL))" to fix build error.
> (Thanks Chengming Zhou)
> - Add __maybe_unused for partial_slabs to prevent compiler warning.
>
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240311132720.37741-1-sxwjean@me.com/T/
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index a3ab096c38c0..ab526960ee5b 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2588,7 +2588,7 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> {
> struct slab *slab, *slab2, *partial = NULL;
> unsigned long flags;
> - unsigned int partial_slabs = 0;
> + unsigned int __maybe_unused partial_slabs = 0;
>
> /*
> * Racy check. If we mistakenly see no partial slabs then we
> @@ -2620,19 +2620,21 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> if (!partial) {
> partial = slab;
> stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
> - } else {
> - put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
> - stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
> - partial_slabs++;
> +
> + /* Fill cpu partial if needed from next iteration, or break */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL))
> + continue;
> + else
> + break;
> }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
> - if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
> - || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL)
Hmm, these two CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL look verbose to me :(
How about using just one, maybe like this?
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2ef88bbf56a3..a018c715b648 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2620,19 +2620,16 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
if (!partial) {
partial = slab;
stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
} else {
put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
- partial_slabs++;
- }
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
- if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
- || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
- break;
+ if (++partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
+ break;
#else
- break;
+ break;
#endif
-
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
return partial;
> + put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
> + stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
> +
> + if (++partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs/2)
> break;
> -#else
> - break;
> #endif
> -
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
> return partial;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-12 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-12 14:05 [PATCH v2] mm/slub: Simplify get_partial_node() sxwjean
2024-03-12 15:22 ` Chengming Zhou [this message]
2024-03-13 6:15 ` Song, Xiongwei
2024-03-13 23:36 ` David Rientjes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38beee7c-aceb-4d59-ac79-e7e412a01588@linux.dev \
--to=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=sxwjean@me.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).