From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E66C433EF for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D0D1E6B0072; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:38:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CBCC96B0073; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:38:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B841B6B0074; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:38:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0013.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.13]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D9B6B0072 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 21:38:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7663412AB for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:38:44 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79582389768.12.7E905AB Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by imf13.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D613D20088 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:38:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id y13-20020a17090a154d00b001eaaa3b9b8dso183879pja.2 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:38:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language:to :cc:references:from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FsbGtY6ybO5i94cEGRw91xXrnBAb+w+D3K5JghnAVfE=; b=mK2rmvByw5FxP/VDuR9Uau4CGs06KNreFgtZGESJcIUwQdX/OpPXHXY0XKwGLvs61p gtlfa47NadAmHWf/nF9v8oHxPfmUwuF/sm+3/7KdLZXGi3rv2bfG+gvcIZjjoAYrEA/i syTdr5Hk8vr8eEe1FbAcKY+OM6fqHZZkqmdynP4zelBB6Z6h3/eRQ4dHVyBWYTf1+5s/ Yh4w38dSFTsPgXP608Ogjt1ALqpoyv8mz6j4mqR2JT7O1jj6ElkpnN+xv3z4eWrpnFx6 aa4NIsgs6eKGNOFNleSHoNNb85SHvIHqyJ14jWT9LU0UbJOuVaY3wvlEoX5faFtFDLN/ CblQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=FsbGtY6ybO5i94cEGRw91xXrnBAb+w+D3K5JghnAVfE=; b=yji4Zk4BT2GUX6r2tBbcDZSvqv7O026Z8x7ny5orRwhyNsl3l1QKp5i8BaW37tkeye QWd+wVplyWRgvJF3innCOlhBUkz2P8L17SLST8moonMBKner3waJcbIZsBRHvbxcbSsa RYCVVHxr/gQFr+dTNItKLjV8Od7C2AjqNSPUVciufZ0LaLSLme/A7oYxEIpYk5K65pKs ZkiSrMJgorGBhfGCt2qnEJTWJ9K5XriOZHMAM7vZlGSryYJ8eiJF6jlTb0NX/tQ1Phnb o9q/larmv2wsTWTWvx/LMNmMzEu/WT7IjCCJQpl0n0GLnu5TDhNGmcnBiG02PIMEwmsD BEvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/IZSAP/3ZfBgiwYxfVuKdwhcXEwiEsRQ5HqFG31ypPbXQ4yIHi z9beAz1G7btnZkQ/QWE+77w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1ulUMg+nyfV+Q9WLCBZ5A5YYGzZ7XNO3ds3ZmYEF5y9LsWVHB4sLYTgNqHy5SiKSol8wRNk9w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3b88:b0:1e6:7aa2:4301 with SMTP id pc8-20020a17090b3b8800b001e67aa24301mr13162105pjb.118.1655343522796; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs28-116-206-12-50.three.co.id. [116.206.12.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e13-20020a17090301cd00b0015e8d4eb1d2sm301894plh.28.2022.06.15.18.38.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 18:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38c5d597-4e24-6933-dbf7-b98dd7458cc7@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 08:38:38 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: highmem: Use literal block for *kmap_local_folio() example Content-Language: en-US To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Ira Weiny , "Fabio M. De Francesco" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20220615101509.516520-1-bagasdotme@gmail.com> From: Bagas Sanjaya In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1655343523; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=FsbGtY6ybO5i94cEGRw91xXrnBAb+w+D3K5JghnAVfE=; b=BDdneqUQdZmhfr321MDoKd1jlS1b5lTtebaf6QsLduvT+aoLFn4BUDfHS8khXDv/AkODsg 6zqjuGzrCrPQ1KfI6Y+lBglM9YEJ1Ha36FfSyI/ND9BiCLiBlmDomMj9dSE5NC4gayAVKb BN3irUXS6YXKX+dEIZ+l6/o/mPIaAJ8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mK2rmvBy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of bagasdotme@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bagasdotme@gmail.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1655343523; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ZZv/d4IvCi2cnI13JBZjIIHuhOEDGLBuLG/fDuCO+IiwTh4FZ7quJTHKRadZIgmIf+Y2Xc awoBiyVrfECax3IRdioTTn8cYMhgZJTVxUmR3SWVD90GkcwxyC1bjRRNk1ZEY/UaKZTR+a iq0QJjsTxl6ShEZJS8xqoaM7tOF1oKk= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D613D20088 X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: dq9peo7hh5uh3duyk3qqfeqdha9ux1tj Authentication-Results: imf13.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=mK2rmvBy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (imf13.hostedemail.com: domain of bagasdotme@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bagasdotme@gmail.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-HE-Tag: 1655343523-171224 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000001, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 6/15/22 21:37, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 05:15:10PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >> These warnings above are due to comments in code example of >> kmap_atomic() inside kernel-doc comment of *kmap_local_folio() are enclosed > > You still seem to think this has something to do with kmap_local_folio(). > It has nothing to do with kmap_local_folio(). Your next version of this > patch should not mention kmap_local_folio() anywhere. > But I think mentioning kmap_local_folio() is necessary in the patch subject, because we know the original warning is pointed to kernel-doc comment of that funcion. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara