From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <396F0E1D.AE1C4D27@uow.edu.au> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 22:57:01 +1000 From: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: vmtruncate question References: <396BCFA8.C033D94A@uow.edu.au>, <396BCFA8.C033D94A@uow.edu.au>; from andrewm@uow.edu.au on Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:53:44AM +0000 <20000714111802.R3113@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" List-ID: "Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 01:53:44AM +0000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > The flushes which surround the second call to zap_page_range() > > would appear to be flushing more memory than is to be > > zapped. Is this correct, or should it be: > > Yes, I noticed that too: I think you're right. OK, thanks. I'll implement this in the changes which are part of the low-lat patch and send it off to LT tonight. If he says "no low-latency" then I'll make sure this issue isn't forgotten about. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux.eu.org/Linux-MM/