Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5

Rik van Riel
2002-09-10T02:02:14Z

On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> > Skipping is dumb. It shouldn't have been on that list in the
> > first place.
>
> Sure, it's not the only way to skin the cat. Anyway, skipping isn't so
> dumb that we haven't been doing it for years.

Skipping might even be the correct thing to do, if we leave
the pages on the inactive list in strict LRU order instead
of wrapping them over to the other end of the list...

regards,

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org