Re: [PATCH] modified segq for 2.5

Rik van Riel
2002-09-09T22:54:29Z

On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote:

> Ideally some distinction would be nice, even if only to distinguish I/O
> demanded to be done directly by the workload from background writeback
> and/or readahead.

OK, are we talking about page replacement or does queue scanning
have priority over the quality of page replacement ? ;)

Rik
--
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Spamtraps of the month: september@surriel.com trac@trac.org