Re: 2.6.0-test10-mm1

Christoph Hellwig
2003-11-26T13:25:05Z

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 05:29:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> But I do not think that making a single kernel symbol inaccessible is an
> appropriate way of resolving a GPFS licensing dispute.

well, GFPS is a derived work with or without it. It's just that I remember
we had that agreement about merging it only with the _GPL export. In fact
I'm pretty sure Paul told something about GPLed distributed filesystems from
IBM in that context..