Re: [PATCH] mm/mprotect: fix obsolete function name in change_pte_range()

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 23.07.23 05:31, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> Since commit 79a1971c5f14 ("mm: move the copy_one_pte() pte_present check
> into the caller"), the explanation of preserving soft-dirtiness is moved
> into copy_nonpresent_pte(). Update corresponding comment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
>   mm/mprotect.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 5c3112d92466..3f36c88a238e 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>   			} else if (is_writable_device_private_entry(entry)) {
>   				/*
>   				 * We do not preserve soft-dirtiness. See
> -				 * copy_one_pte() for explanation.
> +				 * copy_nonpresent_pte() for explanation.
>   				 */
>   				entry = make_readable_device_private_entry(
>   							swp_offset(entry));

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb