From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com, ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 12:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b105623-95c2-4d4b-b49f-dd087eaa652b@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250718090244.21092-3-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 18/07/2025 10:02, Dev Jain wrote:
> For the MM_CP_PROT_NUMA skipping case, observe that, if we skip an
> iteration due to the underlying folio satisfying any of the skip
> conditions, then for all subsequent ptes which map the same folio, the
> iteration will be skipped for them too. Therefore, we can optimize
> by using folio_pte_batch() to batch skip the iterations.
>
> Use prot_numa_skip() introduced in the previous patch to determine whether
> we need to skip the iteration. Change its signature to have a double
> pointer to a folio, which will be used by mprotect_folio_pte_batch() to
> determine the number of iterations we can safely skip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> ---
> mm/mprotect.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
> index 2a9c73bd0778..97adc62c50ab 100644
> --- a/mm/mprotect.c
> +++ b/mm/mprotect.c
> @@ -83,28 +83,43 @@ bool can_change_pte_writable(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> return pte_dirty(pte);
> }
>
> +static int mprotect_folio_pte_batch(struct folio *folio, pte_t *ptep,
> + pte_t pte, int max_nr_ptes)
> +{
> + /* No underlying folio, so cannot batch */
> + if (!folio)
> + return 1;
> +
> + if (!folio_test_large(folio))
> + return 1;
> +
> + return folio_pte_batch(folio, ptep, pte, max_nr_ptes);
> +}
> +
> static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> - pte_t oldpte, pte_t *pte, int target_node)
> + pte_t oldpte, pte_t *pte, int target_node,
> + struct folio **foliop)
> {
> - struct folio *folio;
> + struct folio *folio = NULL;
> + bool ret = true;
> bool toptier;
> int nid;
>
> /* Avoid TLB flush if possible */
> if (pte_protnone(oldpte))
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> folio = vm_normal_folio(vma, addr, oldpte);
> if (!folio)
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> if (folio_is_zone_device(folio) || folio_test_ksm(folio))
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> /* Also skip shared copy-on-write pages */
> if (is_cow_mapping(vma->vm_flags) &&
> (folio_maybe_dma_pinned(folio) || folio_maybe_mapped_shared(folio)))
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> /*
> * While migration can move some dirty pages,
> @@ -112,7 +127,7 @@ static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> * context.
> */
> if (folio_is_file_lru(folio) && folio_test_dirty(folio))
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> /*
> * Don't mess with PTEs if page is already on the node
> @@ -120,7 +135,7 @@ static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> */
> nid = folio_nid(folio);
> if (target_node == nid)
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> toptier = node_is_toptier(nid);
>
> @@ -129,11 +144,15 @@ static bool prot_numa_skip(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
> * balancing is disabled
> */
> if (!(sysctl_numa_balancing_mode & NUMA_BALANCING_NORMAL) && toptier)
> - return true;
> + goto skip;
>
> + ret = false;
> if (folio_use_access_time(folio))
> folio_xchg_access_time(folio, jiffies_to_msecs(jiffies));
> - return false;
> +
> +skip:
> + *foliop = folio;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> @@ -147,6 +166,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> bool prot_numa = cp_flags & MM_CP_PROT_NUMA;
> bool uffd_wp = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP;
> bool uffd_wp_resolve = cp_flags & MM_CP_UFFD_WP_RESOLVE;
> + int nr_ptes;
>
> tlb_change_page_size(tlb, PAGE_SIZE);
> pte = pte_offset_map_lock(vma->vm_mm, pmd, addr, &ptl);
> @@ -161,8 +181,11 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> flush_tlb_batched_pending(vma->vm_mm);
> arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode();
> do {
> + nr_ptes = 1;
> oldpte = ptep_get(pte);
> if (pte_present(oldpte)) {
> + int max_nr_ptes = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct folio *folio;
> pte_t ptent;
>
> /*
> @@ -170,9 +193,15 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> * pages. See similar comment in change_huge_pmd.
> */
> if (prot_numa) {
> - if (prot_numa_skip(vma, addr, oldpte, pte,
> - target_node))
> + int ret = prot_numa_skip(vma, addr, oldpte, pte,
> + target_node, &folio);
> + if (ret) {
> +
> + /* determine batch to skip */
> + nr_ptes = mprotect_folio_pte_batch(folio,
> + pte, oldpte, max_nr_ptes);
> continue;
> + }
> }
>
> oldpte = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, pte);
> @@ -289,7 +318,7 @@ static long change_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
> pages++;
> }
> }
> - } while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> + } while (pte += nr_ptes, addr += nr_ptes * PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode();
> pte_unmap_unlock(pte - 1, ptl);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-22 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-18 9:02 [PATCH v5 0/7] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] mm: Refactor MM_CP_PROT_NUMA skipping case into new function Dev Jain
2025-07-18 16:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 23:44 ` Barry Song
2025-07-21 3:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-22 11:05 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-22 11:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 13:57 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() for MM_CP_PROT_NUMA by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-07-18 16:40 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-22 11:26 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2025-07-23 14:25 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:05 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 23:59 ` Barry Song
2025-07-22 11:35 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 15:09 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] mm: Introduce FPB_RESPECT_WRITE for PTE batching infrastructure Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-22 11:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-07-23 15:28 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-23 15:32 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] mm: Split can_change_pte_writable() into private and shared parts Dev Jain
2025-07-18 17:27 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-23 15:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by PTE batching Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:49 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-19 13:46 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-20 11:20 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-20 14:39 ` Dev Jain
2025-07-24 19:55 ` Zi Yan
2025-08-06 8:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 8:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 8:15 ` Will Deacon
2025-08-06 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 8:53 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 8:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 9:12 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 9:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 9:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 9:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 10:04 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:07 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:20 ` Dev Jain
2025-08-06 10:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-08-06 10:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-06 10:45 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-18 9:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] arm64: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:50 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-21 15:57 ` Catalin Marinas
2025-07-18 9:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] Optimize mprotect() for large folios Dev Jain
2025-07-18 18:53 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b105623-95c2-4d4b-b49f-dd087eaa652b@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).