From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/vm86/32: Remove VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP support
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:55:05 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d34069ab2d249d866ea1d18a47e4170dbfb5982.1610132102.git.luto@kernel.org> (raw)
The implementation was rather buggy. It unconditionally marked PTEs
read-only, even for VM_SHARED mappings. I'm not sure whether this is
actually a problem, but it certainly seems unwise. More importantly, it
released the mmap lock before flushing the TLB, which could allow a racing
CoW operation to falsely believe that the underlying memory was not
writable.
I can't find any users at all of this mechanism, so just remove it.
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vm86.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c | 55 ++++++--------------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vm86.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vm86.h
index d2ee4e307ef8..50004fb4590d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vm86.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vm86.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ struct vm86_struct {
/*
* flags masks
*/
-#define VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP 0x0001
+#define VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP 0x0001 /* no longer supported */
struct vm86plus_info_struct {
unsigned long force_return_for_pic:1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
index 764573de3996..28b9e8d511e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vm86_32.c
@@ -160,49 +160,6 @@ void save_v86_state(struct kernel_vm86_regs *regs, int retval)
do_exit(SIGSEGV);
}
-static void mark_screen_rdonly(struct mm_struct *mm)
-{
- struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- spinlock_t *ptl;
- pgd_t *pgd;
- p4d_t *p4d;
- pud_t *pud;
- pmd_t *pmd;
- pte_t *pte;
- int i;
-
- mmap_write_lock(mm);
- pgd = pgd_offset(mm, 0xA0000);
- if (pgd_none_or_clear_bad(pgd))
- goto out;
- p4d = p4d_offset(pgd, 0xA0000);
- if (p4d_none_or_clear_bad(p4d))
- goto out;
- pud = pud_offset(p4d, 0xA0000);
- if (pud_none_or_clear_bad(pud))
- goto out;
- pmd = pmd_offset(pud, 0xA0000);
-
- if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) {
- vma = find_vma(mm, 0xA0000);
- split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, 0xA0000);
- }
- if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd))
- goto out;
- pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, pmd, 0xA0000, &ptl);
- for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
- if (pte_present(*pte))
- set_pte(pte, pte_wrprotect(*pte));
- pte++;
- }
- pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
-out:
- mmap_write_unlock(mm);
- flush_tlb_mm_range(mm, 0xA0000, 0xA0000 + 32*PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SHIFT, false);
-}
-
-
-
static int do_vm86_irq_handling(int subfunction, int irqnumber);
static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus);
@@ -282,6 +239,15 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus)
offsetof(struct vm86_struct, int_revectored)))
return -EFAULT;
+
+ /* VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP had numerous bugs and appears to have no users. */
+ if (v.flags & VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP) {
+ char comm[TASK_COMM_LEN];
+
+ pr_info_once("vm86: '%s' uses VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP, which is no longer supported\n", get_task_comm(comm, current);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
memset(&vm86regs, 0, sizeof(vm86regs));
vm86regs.pt.bx = v.regs.ebx;
@@ -370,9 +336,6 @@ static long do_sys_vm86(struct vm86plus_struct __user *user_vm86, bool plus)
update_task_stack(tsk);
preempt_enable();
- if (vm86->flags & VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP)
- mark_screen_rdonly(tsk->mm);
-
memcpy((struct kernel_vm86_regs *)regs, &vm86regs, sizeof(vm86regs));
return regs->ax;
}
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 18:55 Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2021-01-08 19:21 ` [PATCH] x86/vm86/32: Remove VM86_SCREEN_BITMAP support Linus Torvalds
2021-01-08 19:27 ` Brian Gerst
2021-01-08 22:16 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-08 23:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2021-01-09 20:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-01-09 20:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d34069ab2d249d866ea1d18a47e4170dbfb5982.1610132102.git.luto@kernel.org \
--to=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).