From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
anup@brainfault.org, paul.walmsley@sifive.com,
palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
vannapurve@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
mail@maciej.szmigiero.name, david@redhat.com,
michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
steven.price@arm.com, quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, maz@kernel.org,
will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
jgg@nvidia.com, rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com, jthoughton@google.com,
peterx@redhat.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, ira.weiny@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/18] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd-backed guest page faults
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 14:08:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d9a15ff-fbb2-4e9a-b97b-c0e40eb23043@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605153800.557144-15-tabba@google.com>
Hi Fuad,
On 6/6/25 1:37 AM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> Add arm64 support for handling guest page faults on guest_memfd backed
> memslots. Until guest_memfd supports huge pages, the fault granule is
> restricted to PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
One comment below. Otherwise, it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index ce80be116a30..f14925fe6144 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1508,6 +1508,89 @@ static void adjust_nested_fault_perms(struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
> *prot |= kvm_encode_nested_level(nested);
> }
>
> +#define KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_MEMABORT_FLAGS (KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT | KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED)
> +
> +static int gmem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> + struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, bool is_perm)
> +{
> + bool logging, write_fault, exec_fault, writable;
> + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_MEMABORT_FLAGS;
> + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R;
> + struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = vcpu->arch.hw_mmu->pgt;
> + struct page *page;
> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
> + void *memcache;
> + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> + gfn_t gfn;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = prepare_mmu_memcache(vcpu, !is_perm, &memcache);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (nested)
> + gfn = kvm_s2_trans_output(nested) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + else
> + gfn = fault_ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + logging = memslot_is_logging(memslot);
> + write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
> + exec_fault = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_exec_fault(vcpu);
> +
> + if (write_fault && exec_fault) {
> + kvm_err("Simultaneous write and execution fault\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + if (is_perm && !write_fault && !exec_fault) {
> + kvm_err("Unexpected L2 read permission error\n");
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kvm_gmem_get_pfn(kvm, memslot, gfn, &pfn, &page, NULL);
> + if (ret) {
> + kvm_prepare_memory_fault_exit(vcpu, fault_ipa, PAGE_SIZE,
> + write_fault, exec_fault, false);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
-EFAULT or -EHWPOISON shall be returned, as documented in virt/kvm/api.rst. Besides,
kvm_send_hwpoison_signal() should be executed when -EHWPOISON is returned from
kvm_gmem_get_pfn()? :-)
Thanks,
Gavin
> + writable = !(memslot->flags & KVM_MEM_READONLY) &&
> + (!logging || write_fault);
> +
> + if (nested)
> + adjust_nested_fault_perms(nested, &prot, &writable);
> +
> + if (writable)
> + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_W;
> +
> + if (exec_fault ||
> + (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC) &&
> + (!nested || kvm_s2_trans_executable(nested))))
> + prot |= KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_X;
> +
> + kvm_fault_lock(kvm);
> + if (is_perm) {
> + /*
> + * Drop the SW bits in favour of those stored in the
> + * PTE, which will be preserved.
> + */
> + prot &= ~KVM_NV_GUEST_MAP_SZ;
> + ret = KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_relax_perms)(pgt, fault_ipa, prot, flags);
> + } else {
> + ret = KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_map)(pgt, fault_ipa, PAGE_SIZE,
> + __pfn_to_phys(pfn), prot,
> + memcache, flags);
> + }
> + kvm_release_faultin_page(kvm, page, !!ret, writable);
> + kvm_fault_unlock(kvm);
> +
> + if (writable && !ret)
> + mark_page_dirty_in_slot(kvm, memslot, gfn);
> +
> + return ret != -EAGAIN ? ret : 0;
> +}
> +
> static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> struct kvm_s2_trans *nested,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
> @@ -1532,7 +1615,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot = KVM_PGTABLE_PROT_R;
> struct kvm_pgtable *pgt;
> struct page *page;
> - enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_HANDLE_FAULT | KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_SHARED;
> + enum kvm_pgtable_walk_flags flags = KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_MEMABORT_FLAGS;
>
> if (fault_is_perm)
> fault_granule = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_perm_fault_granule(vcpu);
> @@ -1959,8 +2042,12 @@ int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - ret = user_mem_abort(vcpu, fault_ipa, nested, memslot, hva,
> - esr_fsc_is_permission_fault(esr));
> + if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(memslot))
> + ret = gmem_abort(vcpu, fault_ipa, nested, memslot,
> + esr_fsc_is_permission_fault(esr));
> + else
> + ret = user_mem_abort(vcpu, fault_ipa, nested, memslot, hva,
> + esr_fsc_is_permission_fault(esr));
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = 1;
> out:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-09 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 15:37 [PATCH v11 00/18] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 01/18] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GMEM Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 02/18] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 03/18] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_has_private_mem() to kvm_arch_supports_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 04/18] KVM: x86: Rename kvm->arch.has_private_mem to kvm->arch.supports_gmem Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 05/18] KVM: Rename kvm_slot_can_be_private() to kvm_slot_has_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 06/18] KVM: Fix comments that refer to slots_lock Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 07/18] KVM: Fix comment that refers to kvm uapi header path Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 08/18] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd pages Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 9:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-06 9:30 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-06 10:33 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-11 6:29 ` Shivank Garg
2025-06-11 18:20 ` Ackerley Tng
2025-06-08 23:42 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 09/18] KVM: guest_memfd: Track shared memory support in memslot Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-08 23:42 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 10/18] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle guest page faults for guest_memfd with shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 11/18] KVM: x86: Consult guest_memfd when computing max_mapping_level Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 9:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-06 9:48 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 12/18] KVM: x86: Enable guest_memfd shared memory for SW-protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-05 16:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 17:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-05 17:43 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 17:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-05 18:29 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 13/18] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2025-06-09 0:27 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-09 7:01 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-09 9:02 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 14/18] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 17:21 ` James Houghton
2025-06-06 7:31 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 7:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-09 4:08 ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2025-06-09 7:04 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-09 9:06 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 15/18] KVM: arm64: Enable host mapping of shared guest_memfd memory Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 17:26 ` James Houghton
2025-06-09 0:29 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 16/18] KVM: Introduce the KVM capability KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 15:37 ` [PATCH v11 17/18] KVM: selftests: Don't use hardcoded page sizes in guest_memfd test Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 8:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-08 23:43 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-05 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 18/18] KVM: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-06-05 22:07 ` James Houghton
2025-06-05 22:12 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 22:17 ` James Houghton
2025-06-06 8:14 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-08 23:43 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-09 7:06 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-06-06 9:18 ` [PATCH v11 00/18] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d9a15ff-fbb2-4e9a-b97b-c0e40eb23043@redhat.com \
--to=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amoorthy@google.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=jthoughton@google.com \
--cc=keirf@google.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).