Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: ghost swapfile support for zswap

[Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>]

On Tue, 2025-11-25 at 22:50 +0400, Chris Li wrote:
> 
> > - We still cannot do swapoff efficiently as we need to walk the
> > page
> >   tables (and some swap tables) to find and swapin all entries in a
> >   swapfile. Not as important as other things, but worth mentioning.
> 
> That need rmap for swap entries. It It is an independent issue.
> 

Wouldn't rmap for swap entries be more expensive than
simply always having indirection for swap entries that
are in use?

With indirection, swapoff can just move pages from
the being-swapoffed device into the swap cache, and
if needed the memory can then be moved to another
swap device, without ever needing to find the page
tables.

This sounds like an uncommon scenario, but it is
functionally identical to what is done to pages
during zswap writeback, where the page table entries
stay unchanged, and the swap page is simply moved
to another backend location.

Why implement two things, when we can have one
thing that does both, with no extra complexity
over what zswap writeback needs?

-- 
All Rights Reversed.