From: "minchan Kim" <barrioskmc@gmail.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:49:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c63dc40802200149r6b03d970g2fbde74b85ad5443@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220181447.6444.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Feb 20, 2008 6:24 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi Kim-san
>
> Do you adjust hackbench parameter?
> my parameter adjust my test machine(8GB mem),
> if unchanged, maybe doesn't works it because lack memory.
I already adjusted it. :-)
But, In my desktop, I couldn't make to consune my swap device above
half. (My swap device is 512M size)
Because my kernel almost was hang before happening many swapping.
Perhaps, it might be a not hang. However, Although I wait a very long
time, My box don't have a any response.
I will try do it more.
> > I am a many interested in your patch. so I want to test it with exact
> > same method as you did.
> > I will test it in embedded environment(ARM 920T, 32M ram) and my
> > desktop machine.(Core2Duo 2.2G, 2G ram)
>
> Hm
> I don't have embedded test machine.
> but I can desktop.
> I will test it about weekend.
> if you don't mind, could you please send me .config file
> and tell me your test kernel version?
I mean I will test your patch by myself.
Because I already have a embedded board and Desktop.
> Thanks, interesting report.
>
>
> > I guess this patch won't be efficient in embedded environment.
> > Since many embedded board just have one processor and don't have any
> > swap device.
>
> reclaim conflict rarely happened on UP.
> thus, my patch expect no improvement.
I agree with you.
> but (of course) I will fix regression.
I didn't say your patch had a regression.
What I mean is just that I am concern about it.
Actually, Many VM guys is working on server environment.
They didn't try to do performance test in embedde system.
and that patch was submitted in mainline.
Actually, I am concern about it.
> > So, How do I evaluate following field as you did ?
> >
> > * elapse (what do you mean it ??)
> > * major fault
>
> /usr/bin/time command output that.
>
>
> > * max parallel reclaim tasks:
> > * max consumption time of
> > try_to_free_pages():
>
> sorry, I inserted debug code to my patch at that time.
>
Could you send me that debug code ?
If you will send it to me, I will test it my environment (ARM-920T, Core2Duo).
And I will report test result.
--
Thanks,
barrios
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-20 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-19 5:44 [RFC][PATCH] the proposal of improve page reclaim by throttle KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-19 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2008-02-19 7:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-19 13:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-20 8:56 ` minchan Kim
2008-02-20 9:24 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-20 9:49 ` minchan Kim [this message]
2008-02-20 10:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-21 9:38 ` minchan Kim
2008-02-21 10:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-21 12:29 ` minchan Kim
2008-02-21 12:41 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-21 9:48 ` Balbir Singh
2008-02-21 11:01 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-02-21 11:02 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44c63dc40802200149r6b03d970g2fbde74b85ad5443@mail.gmail.com \
--to=barrioskmc@gmail.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).