Re: build error: sparsemem + SLOB

Matt Mackall
2006-11-21T19:29:20Z

On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 11:32:57AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > Are there any implications for preemptible kernels here?
>
> Matt: Would you mind if I replace SLOB with my new slab design? It is as
> memory efficient as yours (maybe even more since we do not have the
> header for each allocation). It can work efficiently in an SMP system
> (NUMA still under test). The code is more complex though.
> Still needs to mature.

How's the code size compare?

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.