Re: [patches] threaded vma patches (was Re: missing madvise functionality)

Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04T06:50:17Z

Ulrich Drepper a A(C)crit :
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>> Sad. Although Ulrich did seem interested at one point I think? Ulrich,
>> do you agree at least with the interface that Eric is proposing?
>
> I have no idea what you're talking about.
>

You were CC on this one, you can find an archive here :

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/15/230

This avoids mmap_sem for private futexes (PTHREAD_PROCESS_PRIVATE semantic)