From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, shak <dshaks@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:58:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46298BE8.8020900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46295F59.8000506@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Rik van Riel a A(C)crit :
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:38:06 -0400
>>> Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've also merged Nick's "mm: madvise avoid exclusive mmap_sem".
>>>>>
>>>>> - Nick's patch also will help this problem. It could be that your
>>>>> patch
>>>>> no longer offers a 2x speedup when combined with Nick's patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> It could well be that the combination of the two is even better,
>>>>> but it
>>>>> would be nice to firm that up a bit.
>>>> I'll test that.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Well, good news.
>>
>> It turns out that Nick's patch does not improve peak
>> performance much, but it does prevent the decline when
>> running with 16 threads on my quad core CPU!
>>
>> We _definately_ want both patches, there's a huge benefit
>> in having them both.
>>
>> Here are the transactions/seconds for each combination:
>>
>> vanilla new glibc madv_free kernel madv_free + mmap_sem
>> threads
>>
>> 1 610 609 596 545
>
> 545 tps versus 610 tps for one thread ? It seems quite bad, no ?
>
> Could you please find an explanation for this ?
I have no idea why this happens. Especially the last one,
going from a write lock to a read lock on the mmap_sem
should not make ANY difference whatsoever since we're
running single threaded!
>> 2 1032 1136 1196 1200
>> 4 1070 1128 2014 2024
>> 8 1000 1088 1665 2087
>> 16 779 1073 1310 1999
Performance with 2 database threads is way better though,
and performance with 4 or more threads more than doubles...
If you have an explanation on why single threaded performance
went down a little on my quad core system, please let me know.
Does performance suffer at all on a real UP system?
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-21 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 7:15 [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Rik van Riel
2007-04-19 21:15 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2 Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:24 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-21 7:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 16:32 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-20 20:57 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:38 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 22:06 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 23:52 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21 0:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-21 3:58 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-04-21 7:12 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23 4:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22 2:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22 2:50 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22 6:31 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 0:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 3:53 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 3:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:07 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:12 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 3:59 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 9:20 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:21 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:31 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:44 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24 1:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 1:58 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24 2:16 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24 4:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-04-24 5:13 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24 2:53 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24 3:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 10:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23 11:45 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 4:28 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21 7:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 18:06 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-22 8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22 9:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-22 16:55 ` Ulrich Drepper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46298BE8.8020900@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox