public inbox for linux-mm@kvack.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, shak <dshaks@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:58:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46298BE8.8020900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46295F59.8000506@cosmosbay.com>

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Rik van Riel a A(C)crit :
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:38:06 -0400
>>> Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've also merged Nick's "mm: madvise avoid exclusive mmap_sem".
>>>>>
>>>>> - Nick's patch also will help this problem.  It could be that your 
>>>>> patch
>>>>>   no longer offers a 2x speedup when combined with Nick's patch.
>>>>>
>>>>>   It could well be that the combination of the two is even better, 
>>>>> but it
>>>>>   would be nice to firm that up a bit.  
>>>> I'll test that.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>
>> Well, good news.
>>
>> It turns out that Nick's patch does not improve peak
>> performance much, but it does prevent the decline when
>> running with 16 threads on my quad core CPU!
>>
>> We _definately_ want both patches, there's a huge benefit
>> in having them both.
>>
>> Here are the transactions/seconds for each combination:
>>
>>    vanilla   new glibc  madv_free kernel   madv_free + mmap_sem
>> threads
>>
>> 1     610         609             596                545
> 
> 545 tps versus 610 tps for one thread ? It seems quite bad, no ?
> 
> Could you please find an explanation for this ?

I have no idea why this happens.  Especially the last one,
going from a write lock to a read lock on the mmap_sem
should not make ANY difference whatsoever since we're
running single threaded!

>> 2    1032        1136            1196               1200
>> 4    1070        1128            2014               2024
>> 8    1000        1088            1665               2087
>> 16    779        1073            1310               1999

Performance with 2 database threads is way better though,
and performance with 4 or more threads more than doubles...

If you have an explanation on why single threaded performance
went down a little on my quad core system, please let me know.

Does performance suffer at all on a real UP system?

-- 
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is.  Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-21  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-17  7:15 [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Rik van Riel
2007-04-19 21:15 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE 2/2 Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 21:03   ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:24     ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-21  7:37       ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 16:32         ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-04-20 20:57 ` [PATCH] lazy freeing of memory through MADV_FREE Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 21:38   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-20 22:06     ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-20 23:52       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  0:48         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-21  3:58           ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2007-04-21  7:12         ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23  4:36           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:36         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  2:50           ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-22  6:31           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  0:16             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23  3:53               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:58                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:07                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:12                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  3:59                 ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  9:20                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:21                     ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:31                       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23 10:35                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-23 10:44                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  1:15                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  1:58                               ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-24  4:42                                 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-04-24  5:13                                   ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  2:53                           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-24  3:08                             ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 10:44                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2007-04-23 11:45                     ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-23  4:28           ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-21  7:24     ` Hugh Dickins
2007-04-21 18:06       ` Rik van Riel
2007-04-22  8:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-22  9:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-22 16:55     ` Ulrich Drepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46298BE8.8020900@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=dshaks@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox