Re: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related patches

[Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>]

Joel Schopp wrote:
>> But if you don't require a lot of higher order allocations anyway, then
>> guest fragmentation caused by ballooning doesn't seem like much problem.
> 
> If you only need to allocate 1 page size and smaller allocations then no
> it's not a problem.  As soon as you go above that it will be.  You don't
> need to go all the way up to MAX_ORDER size to see an impact, it's just
> increasingly more severe as you get away from 1 page and towards MAX_ORDER.

Yep, the allocator thinks of things less than order-4 as "easy to
obtain" in that it is willing to wait indefinatly for one to to appear,
above that they are not expected to appear.  With random placement the
chances of finding a page tend to 0 pretty quickly as order increases.
That was the motivation for the linear reclaim/lumpy reclaim patch
series which do make it significantly more possible to get higher
orders.  However very high orders such as we see with huge pages are
still almost impossible to obtain without placement controls in place.

-apw

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>