From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MM : alloc_large_system_hash() can free some memory for non power-of-two bucketsize
Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 20:41:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464F44BD.3040209@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070519182123.GD19966@holomorphy.com>
William Lee Irwin III a ecrit :
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:54:54AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> alloc_large_system_hash() is called at boot time to allocate space
>> for several large hash tables.
>> Lately, TCP hash table was changed and its bucketsize is not a
>> power-of-two anymore.
>> On most setups, alloc_large_system_hash() allocates one big page
>> (order > 0) with __get_free_pages(GFP_ATOMIC, order). This single
>> high_order page has a power-of-two size, bigger than the needed size.
>> We can free all pages that wont be used by the hash table.
>> On a 1GB i386 machine, this patch saves 128 KB of LOWMEM memory.
>> TCP established hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 393216 bytes)
>
> The proper way to do this is to convert the large system hashtable
> users to use some data structure / algorithm other than hashing by
> separate chaining.
No thanks. This was already discussed to death on netdev. To date, hash tables
are a good compromise.
I dont mind losing part of memory, I prefer to keep good performance when
handling 1.000.000 or more tcp sessions.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-19 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 9:54 [PATCH] MM : alloc_large_system_hash() can free some memory for non power-of-two bucketsize Eric Dumazet
2007-05-18 18:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-19 8:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-19 18:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-19 18:54 ` David Miller, Eric Dumazet
2007-05-19 20:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-05-19 18:21 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-19 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2007-05-21 8:11 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464F44BD.3040209@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).