Re: [rfc] balance-on-fork NUMA placement

Ingo Molnar
2007-08-01T06:19:01Z

* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:

> > _after_ the dup_task_struct(). Then change sched_fork() to return a
> > CPU number - hence we dont have a separate sched_fork_suggest_cpu()
> > initialization function, only one, obvious sched_fork() function.
> > Agreed?
>
> That puts task struct, kernel stack, thread info on the wrong node.

ok, i missed that - your patch looks then fine to me.

Ingo