From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46EAB004.7010905@mbligh.org> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:00:04 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Add node states sysfs class attributeS - V5 References: <20070827222912.8b364352.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070827231214.99e3c33f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1188309928.5079.37.camel@localhost> <29495f1d0708281513g406af15an8139df5fae20ad35@mail.gmail.com> <1188398621.5121.13.camel@localhost> <1189518975.5036.3.camel@localhost> <20070914035058.89b13fa4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070914144300.GE30407@skynet.ie> In-Reply-To: <20070914144300.GE30407@skynet.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Mel Gorman Cc: Andrew Morton , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm , Christoph Lameter , Nish Aravamudan , y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, Kamezawa Hiroyuki , Eric Whitney , Andy Whitcroft , lethal@linux-sh.org List-ID: >> So how do we get it tested with CONFIG_HIGHMEM=y? Needs an i386 >> numa machine, yes? Perhaps Andy or Martin can remember to do this >> sometime, but they'll need a test plan ;) >> > > As an aside, 32 Bit NUMA usually means we turn the NUMAQ into a whipping boy > and give the problem lip service. The x440 should be 32-bit NUMA too if it hasn't gone up in flames yet. > However, I'd be interested in hearing if > superh has dependencies on 32 bit NUMA working properly, including HIGHMEM > issues. > > I've cc'd Paul Mundt. Paul, does superh use 32 bit NUMA? Is it used with > with HIGHMEM? > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org