From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@google.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <andyw@uk.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: What can we do to get ready for memory controller merge in 2.6.25
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:48:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <474EE667.6050106@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071129104726.5698321f@cuia.boston.redhat.com>
Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:13:17 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> They say better strike when the iron is hot.
>>
>> Since we have so many people discussing the memory controller, I would
>> like to access the readiness of the memory controller for mainline
>> merge.
>
>> At the VM-Summit we decided to try the current double LRU approach for
>> memory control. At this juncture in the space-time continuum, I seek
>> your support, feedback, comments and help to move the memory controller
>
> The memory controller code currently in -mm seems fine to me,
> especially with the changes that got committed over the last
> days making reclaim more efficient.
>
Yes, I agree. Per zone reclaim and lists have helped make the code
better. Credit goes to KAMEZAWA-San for the per zone code and to
YAMAMOTO-San for background reclaim.
> I don't think there are any bugs left that can be found by
> code inspection - only the kind of testing that the mainline
> kernel gets might shake out more bugs.
>
> I would like to see the memory controller code go into the
> mainline kernel ASAP.
>
Excellent, thanks!
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-29 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-29 14:43 What can we do to get ready for memory controller merge in 2.6.25 Balbir Singh
2007-11-29 15:47 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-29 16:18 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-11-30 2:11 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-30 3:13 ` Balbir Singh
2007-11-30 10:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-05 10:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2007-12-01 7:39 ` Paul Menage
2007-12-01 9:50 ` Balbir Singh
2007-12-01 18:36 ` Rik van Riel
2007-12-01 19:02 ` Paul Menage
2007-12-01 19:26 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=474EE667.6050106@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andyw@uk.ibm.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).