Re: [PATCH 2/2] Make res_counter hierarchical

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> This allows us two things basically:
> 
> 1. If the subgroup has the limit higher than its parent has
>    then the one will get more memory than allowed.

But should we allow such configuration? I suspect that we should catch such
things at the time of writing the limit.

> 2. When we will need to account for a resource in more than
>    one place, we'll be able to use this technics.
> 
>    Look, consider we have a memory limit and swap limit. The
>    memory limit is the limit for the sum of RSS, page cache
>    and swap usage. To account for this gracefuly, we'll set
>    two counters:
> 
> 	   res_counter mem_counter;
> 	   res_counter swap_counter;
> 
>    attach mm to the swap one
> 
> 	   mm->mem_cnt = &swap_counter;
> 
>    and make the swap_counter be mem's child. That's it. If we
>    want hierarchical support, then the tree will look like this:
> 
>    mem_counter_top
>     swap_counter_top <- mm_struct living at top
>      mem_counter_sub
>       swap_counter_sub <- mm_struct living at sub
> 

Hmm... not sure about this one. What I want to see is a resource counter
hierarchy to mimic the container hierarchy. Then ensure that all limits are set
sanely. I am planning to implement shares support on to of resource counters.


> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/res_counter.h |   11 ++++++++++-
>  kernel/res_counter.c        |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  mm/memcontrol.c             |    9 ++++++---
>  3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/res_counter.h b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> index 2c4deb5..a27105e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/res_counter.h
> +++ b/include/linux/res_counter.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ struct res_counter {
>  	 * the routines below consider this to be IRQ-safe
>  	 */
>  	spinlock_t lock;
> +	/*
> +	 * the parent counter. used for hierarchical resource accounting
> +	 */
> +	struct res_counter *parent;
>  };
> 
>  /**
> @@ -80,7 +84,12 @@ enum {
>   * helpers for accounting
>   */
> 
> -void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter);
> +/*
> + * the parent pointer is set only once - during the counter
> + * initialization. caller then must itself provide that this
> + * pointer is valid during the new counter lifetime
> + */
> +void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent);
> 
>  /*
>   * charge - try to consume more resource.
> diff --git a/kernel/res_counter.c b/kernel/res_counter.c
> index f1f20c2..046f6f4 100644
> --- a/kernel/res_counter.c
> +++ b/kernel/res_counter.c
> @@ -13,10 +13,11 @@
>  #include <linux/res_counter.h>
>  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> 
> -void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter)
> +void res_counter_init(struct res_counter *counter, struct res_counter *parent)
>  {
>  	spin_lock_init(&counter->lock);
>  	counter->limit = (unsigned long long)LLONG_MAX;
> +	counter->parent = parent;
>  }
> 
>  int res_counter_charge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
> @@ -36,10 +37,26 @@ int res_counter_charge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct res_counter *c, *unroll_c;
> +
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	for (c = counter; c != NULL; c = c->parent) {
> +		spin_lock(&c->lock);
> +		ret = res_counter_charge_locked(c, val);
> +		spin_unlock(&c->lock);
> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			goto unroll;

We'd like to know which resource counter failed to allow charging, so that we
can reclaim from that mem_res_cgroup.

> +	}
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	return 0;
> 
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->lock, flags);
> -	ret = res_counter_charge_locked(counter, val);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
> +unroll:
> +	for (unroll_c = counter; unroll_c != c; unroll_c = unroll_c->parent) {
> +		spin_lock(&unroll_c->lock);
> +		res_counter_uncharge_locked(unroll_c, val);
> +		spin_unlock(&unroll_c->lock);
> +	}
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> @@ -54,10 +71,15 @@ void res_counter_uncharge_locked(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
>  void res_counter_uncharge(struct res_counter *counter, unsigned long val)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct res_counter *c;
> 
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&counter->lock, flags);
> -	res_counter_uncharge_locked(counter, val);
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&counter->lock, flags);
> +	local_irq_save(flags);
> +	for (c = counter; c != NULL; c = c->parent) {
> +		spin_lock(&c->lock);
> +		res_counter_uncharge_locked(c, val);
> +		spin_unlock(&c->lock);
> +	}
> +	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  }
> 
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index e5c741a..61db79c 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -976,19 +976,22 @@ static void free_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
>  static struct cgroup_subsys_state *
>  mem_cgroup_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss, struct cgroup *cont)
>  {
> -	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *mem, *parent;
>  	int node;
> 
>  	if (unlikely((cont->parent) == NULL)) {
>  		mem = &init_mem_cgroup;
>  		init_mm.mem_cgroup = mem;
> -	} else
> +		parent = NULL;
> +	} else {
>  		mem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mem_cgroup), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cont->parent);
> +	}
> 
>  	if (mem == NULL)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> 
> -	res_counter_init(&mem->res);
> +	res_counter_init(&mem->res, parent ? &parent->res : NULL);
> 
>  	memset(&mem->info, 0, sizeof(mem->info));
> 


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>