From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <48041D90.2040702@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:14:24 +0800 From: Li Zefan MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] use vmalloc for mem_cgroup allocation. v2 References: <20080415105434.3044afb6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080415111038.ffac0e12.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080414191730.7d13e619.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080415121617.16127623.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20080415121617.16127623.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "xemul@openvz.org" , menage@google.com, "linux-mm@kvack.org" , LKML List-ID: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:17:30 -0700 > Andrew Morton wrote: >> Well... vmalloced memory is of course a little slower to use - additional >> TLB pressure. >> >> Do you think the memcgroup is accessed frequently enough to use vmalloc() >> only on those architectures which actually need it? >> >> Because it'd be pretty simple to implement: >> >> if (sizeof(struct mem_group) > PAGE_SIZE) >> vmalloc() >> else >> kmalloc() >> >> ... >> >> if (sizeof(struct mem_group) > PAGE_SIZE) >> vfree() >> else >> kfree() >> >> the compiler will optimise away the `if'. >> > > Hmm, ok. I'll rewrite one to do that. > It will be better to use wrappers for these: mem_cgroup_alloc() and mem_cgroup_free() > Thanks, > -Kame > > > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org