From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm][PATCH 3/4] Add rlimit controller accounting and control
Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 09:59:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48214558.9080401@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830805062017n67d67f19w1469050d45e46ad6@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> +
>> +int rlimit_cgroup_charge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
>> + css_get(&rcg->css);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + ret = res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + css_put(&rcg->css);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
> You need to synchronize against mm->owner changing, or
> mm->owner->cgroups changing. How about:
>
> int rlimit_cgroup_charge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
> {
> int ret;
> struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
> struct task_struct *owner;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> again:
>
> /* Find and lock the owner of the mm */
> owner = rcu_dereference(mm->owner);
> task_lock(owner);
> if (mm->owner != owner) {
> task_unlock(owner);
> goto again;
> }
>
> /* Charge the owner's cgroup with the new memory */
> rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(owner);
> ret = res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
> task_unlock(owner);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return ret;
> }
>
>> +
>> +void rlimit_cgroup_uncharge_as(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> +{
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_task(rcu_dereference(mm->owner));
>> + css_get(&rcg->css);
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> +
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&rcg->as_res, (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + css_put(&rcg->css);
>> +}
>
> Can't this be implemented as just a call to charge() with a negative
> value? (Possibly fixing res_counter_charge() to handle negative values
> if necessary) Seems simpler.
No, I'd keep two calls - charge and uncharge. This makes you sure that
the code xxx_charge(value) is a charge, regardless of what the "value"
is. Besides, xxx_charge returns an error code, you need to check (BTW, I
think we should add a __must_check attribute there), while uncharge does
not.
>> +/*
>> + * TODO: get the attach callbacks to fail and disallow task movement.
>> + */
>
> You mean disallow all movement within a hierarchy that has this cgroup
> mounted? Doesn't that make it rather hard to use?
>
>> +static void rlimit_cgroup_move_task(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
>> + struct cgroup *cgrp,
>> + struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
>> + struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct mm_struct *mm;
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg, *old_rcg;
>> +
>> + mm = get_task_mm(p);
>> + if (mm == NULL)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + rcu_read_lock();
>> + if (p != rcu_dereference(mm->owner))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(cgrp);
>> + old_rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(old_cgrp);
>> +
>> + if (rcg == old_rcg)
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + if (res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> + goto out;
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&old_rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> +out:
>> + rcu_read_unlock();
>> + mmput(mm);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Since you need to protect against concurrent charges, and against
> concurrent mm ownership changes, I think you should just do this under
> task_lock(p).
>
>> +static void rlimit_cgroup_mm_owner_changed(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
>> + struct cgroup *cgrp,
>> + struct cgroup *old_cgrp,
>> + struct task_struct *p)
>> +{
>> + struct rlimit_cgroup *rcg, *old_rcg;
>> + struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(p);
>> +
>> + BUG_ON(!mm);
>> + rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(cgrp);
>> + old_rcg = rlimit_cgroup_from_cgrp(old_cgrp);
>> + if (res_counter_charge(&rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT)))
>> + goto out;
>> + res_counter_uncharge(&old_rcg->as_res, (mm->total_vm << PAGE_SHIFT));
>> +out:
>> + mmput(mm);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Also needs to task_lock(p) to prevent concurrent charges or cgroup
> reassignments?
>
> Paul
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-07 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-03 21:37 [-mm][PATCH 0/4] Add rlimit controller to cgroups (v3) Balbir Singh
2008-05-03 21:37 ` [-mm][PATCH 1/4] Setup the rlimit controller Balbir Singh
2008-05-05 22:11 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 3:40 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-06 1:31 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-06 8:15 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-03 21:38 ` [-mm][PATCH 2/4] Enhance cgroup mm_owner_changed callback to add task information Balbir Singh
2008-05-05 22:15 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 3:43 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-05 23:00 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-03 21:38 ` [-mm][PATCH 3/4] Add rlimit controller accounting and control Balbir Singh
2008-05-05 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-05 22:32 ` David Rientjes
2008-05-06 5:34 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-07 3:17 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 5:59 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2008-05-08 14:54 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-08 23:22 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-07 3:29 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-08 14:35 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-08 21:45 ` Paul Menage
2008-05-09 13:35 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-03 21:38 ` [-mm][PATCH 4/4] Add rlimit controller documentation Balbir Singh
2008-05-05 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 5:39 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-06 5:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-06 7:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-04 15:24 ` [-mm][PATCH 0/4] Add rlimit controller to cgroups (v3) kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-05-05 4:21 ` Balbir Singh
2008-05-07 1:09 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-04 15:27 ` kamezawa.hiroyu
2008-05-05 4:24 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48214558.9080401@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).