From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sd0109e.au.ibm.com (d23rh905.au.ibm.com [202.81.18.225]) by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4RDIhw7015403 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 23:18:43 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by sd0109e.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4RDNOSS274162 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 23:23:24 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4RDJEUP020368 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 23:19:14 +1000 Message-ID: <483C0A0D.50909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:48:05 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) References: <483647AB.8090104@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20080527073118.0D92B5A0E@siro.lan> <483BBB4C.3040501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <483BC690.6010206@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <483BC690.6010206@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xemul@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hugh@veritas.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com List-ID: Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>> >>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>> before going further. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>> >>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>> > Of cource. > I'll work hard to make it better. > >> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >> infrastructure used. >> > Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's > and mine? > > Basically, I think it's difficult to merge > because we charge different objects. > Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org