From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d28relay02.in.ibm.com (d28relay02.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.59]) by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m4RDlkgb001139 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:17:46 +0530 Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (d28av04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.66]) by d28relay02.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4RDlSmt876594 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:17:28 +0530 Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av04.in.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4RDljHW004559 for ; Tue, 27 May 2008 19:17:45 +0530 Message-ID: <483C10C0.7040503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 19:16:40 +0530 From: Balbir Singh Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] swapcgroup(v2) References: <483647AB.8090104@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20080527073118.0D92B5A0E@siro.lan> <483BBB4C.3040501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <483BC690.6010206@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <483C0A0D.50909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <483C0FB2.7080706@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <483C0FB2.7080706@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daisuke Nishimura Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi , containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, xemul@openvz.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, hugh@veritas.com, m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com List-ID: Daisuke Nishimura wrote: > On 2008/05/27 22:18 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >> Daisuke Nishimura wrote: >>> On 2008/05/27 16:42 +0900, Balbir Singh wrote: >>>> YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Yamamoto-San is also looking into a swap >>>>>>> controller. Is there a consensus on the approach? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Not yet, but I think we should have some consensus each other >>>>>> before going further. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Daisuke Nishimura. >>>>> while nishimura-san's one still seems to have a lot of todo, >>>>> it seems good enough as a start point to me. >>>>> so i'd like to withdraw mine. >>>>> >>>>> nishimura-san, is it ok for you? >>>>> >>> Of cource. >>> I'll work hard to make it better. >>> >>>> I would suggest that me merge the good parts from both into the swap controller. >>>> Having said that I'll let the two of you decide on what the good aspects of both >>>> are. I cannot see any immediate overlap, but there might be some w.r.t. >>>> infrastructure used. >>>> >>> Well, you mean you'll make another patch based on yamamoto-san's >>> and mine? >>> >>> Basically, I think it's difficult to merge >>> because we charge different objects. >>> >> Yes, I know - that's why I said infrastructure, to see the grouping and common >> data structure aspects. I'll try and review the code. >> > OK. > > I'll wait for your patch. Hi, Daisuke-San I am not sending out any patch (sorry for the confusion, if I caused it). I am going to review the swapcgroup patchset. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org