From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B122FC77B7C for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 4EE666B00B3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 4C5D66B00B5; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:48:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 3DB966B00B6; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:48:59 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0010.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.10]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8F66B00B3 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C7DC05C2 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:48:58 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 83590122756.25.7E2FDEC Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by imf22.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73009C0011 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 11:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FE1HwDNC; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1750765736; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=IyoEGUnEKh2xMct1Vm0AThojLyeGvl2J+i0R24IltHk8sAYCdEdEbTnxYON4k40aq9WHt+ NsEYfcOjVglQqMbe3V4OZWhPRvx+MSISVwQYiCr8GmqgO6CvWpq93rZUjHmXkFCXyeohXC QF1uBMzbp+Fm+CvGStaSFuvqfcMlQ38= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf22.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=FE1HwDNC; spf=pass (imf22.hostedemail.com: domain of david@redhat.com designates 170.10.129.124 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@redhat.com; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=redhat.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1750765736; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=BjJpxF1LECO1PRi8kqM/ATCIsmTz38nbps9nkRr6Q/o=; b=40zdP4ECeVoKWKFSXccToGb9mjWNwSnh1I/Uy4WC8HU7HnHKBIkQJmroR5GKRXaUF436eP eWWvQrB4vzi6ouKQVrDg3m96M71OlU22TZR/utYL1KJKCrwF+WyxJ1VCUBKKlRZrfuq3x9 mKxUSDAvaY7D/w2cwDByn+ozVXYdgXY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1750765735; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=BjJpxF1LECO1PRi8kqM/ATCIsmTz38nbps9nkRr6Q/o=; b=FE1HwDNCbo7jeRLv6FXS941xeN4rDfwtY4h4J6fcAlzEUWpo/e5TyE4GQmIvppX28vdmxu rv/IF4OgushpjNj7RXAcCokEyBZCzFojnE9atfe3cacOTVD+T4O2e0bBuRGLSSb/SgDTcU pb68iYBXe6/jgVKTeiL7KG9DbqwaNt4= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-577--nEpnbc2PeiF7XGIwgrwFQ-1; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:48:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -nEpnbc2PeiF7XGIwgrwFQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: -nEpnbc2PeiF7XGIwgrwFQ_1750765733 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a578958000so1931515f8f.3 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:48:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1750765733; x=1751370533; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:references:cc:to:from:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BjJpxF1LECO1PRi8kqM/ATCIsmTz38nbps9nkRr6Q/o=; b=IUS4+wZq4hSmmqnYIiBDDu0AsbLXNW4UIx8QE20FMEzlDZTC3ewOUMZorkqemBh0qL SbA6UQAKV2fqe53cQkCIzC5UaWYEuykjgtYrnJTIiL9VmplNc19Dmf21BW61ak09en3l sz1uq7Ol+ga0+e9rt9MPWd5vzZpEnqTy04yEnrXwugNFaLQuJ26qPZGaNC0ZytU61Ie+ Byhp2a39bYYmjvapRiMX7deUoGzbjpZ9grS7uiUhdkpLvKX2BYy8Uy1W/s9FgxBNOS/r tvWRaCD4fto34/GtD+o73arOkoxUlRtCaLcCY+nEEZJQwN7LAhDQSG7G7F2mO6GQNChp qriw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVSIXX6MF14JniU6BA8AL/cz/OXKj4pD0GQwo1snrKWWjyZZM/wrga26uUj/vdn9SFzNGKmeY6xtg==@kvack.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxQZkb9YEwauzBnoWNluCx4DBxZWX4UClLqg6Hi2OFeeCdpzGdH Sctlz0d1Do78On3kQdCV5VGfY54xuKPmKg4aYWXiRQGljex6/s14kmdKof0fbg4mb16UUaWjoKT LGoYpVWv8yHZBKUF3aKZS+kOjb8z0TexIgaVFpgKrm9XHmbr0Anfq X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvVagkAHyMn/RrnHBwh8JD83UxUkQZZXSrZFH2Il5CbKdL+yrl0mC4MmybbDZ2 W+Qbe6Neym8Kw+aWHWv4mTQ7r3cgkBy58UuBWL4fSwX7k61EO+f4Seh4hAE0XNQVh236RUHxvMI csuk+fhmtYIlpJyG+XD74mDRpMBMnr+PlhDdUBrGwGq2/peIOTQhrxA/5nufhHl3kcreYx/uXv0 NhTlcJQjNctAOzbYegfyUKb8LFq3WNkna6LYnX4xrnidBUK/9uaFWDFt2s297iADBuvwa643nEe jW4Y11HWQRZN/0hYg3uN1Lxq445OhOuIAUw6YBqhGDcMiika+5DQBc0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:3103:b0:3a4:f7af:b41 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6d128db06mr13100270f8f.15.1750765733435; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:48:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHkmLPYuaxXT2XxgaacTu86F8qbQot0I4+8jm38oh1duDAsrGuV6aY8E5RgTpgxNjpCM1xP1w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:3103:b0:3a4:f7af:b41 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3a6d128db06mr13100242f8f.15.1750765732964; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2a09:80c0:192:0:5dac:bf3d:c41:c3e7? ([2a09:80c0:192:0:5dac:bf3d:c41:c3e7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-453646d156esm141814525e9.11.2025.06.24.04.48.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Jun 2025 04:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <495dc88a-c0b2-4090-a89c-00f000b62a2f@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:48:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/mm: Fix UFFDIO_API usage with proper two-step feature negotiation From: David Hildenbrand To: Nadav Amit , Axel Rasmussen Cc: Li Wang , Andrew Morton , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Peter Xu , Aruna Ramakrishna , Bagas Sanjaya , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , Joey Gouly , Johannes Weiner , Keith Lucas , Ryan Roberts , Shuah Khan , Mike Rapoport References: <20250622081035.378164-1-liwang@redhat.com> <20250624042411.395285-1-liwang@redhat.com> <4fd18a1c-aba2-468a-881f-0507953f2904@redhat.com> <611F9598-A1A4-47B6-B37E-09BF7B4D17D0@gmail.com> <239f75e4-1868-4ac9-882f-664a8863b781@redhat.com> Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <239f75e4-1868-4ac9-882f-664a8863b781@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: _q_Q31ZdiYEHFpM7ACVORUKgPuodPTziCjNqT94Tr-M_1750765733 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Stat-Signature: 6his3eybzie16hdk8edy7ki5kwniiqfz X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 73009C0011 X-Rspam-User: X-HE-Tag: 1750765736-583917 X-HE-Meta: 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 dPyGX0QA v/Ky81wNtfECURv1RzJnKXq4eMbIdn/ZfAyxe7idMUos5Yb09wEiM1J4c68A2bnQk++QlabFkD3KXZJPD6DWRhSsW2rcKBLYNgndjY+5sWqXIIkuZdOFoXELq3mC0gdG6tD3bxj9f4phf4d73YuziPaV+BLHuBo/Fq3DqNEremRp/HuW2ugh3gHPmcqUQGNlMF6/E X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 24.06.25 13:39, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 24.06.25 13:29, Nadav Amit wrote: >> >> >>> On 24 Jun 2025, at 11:22, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> >>> On 24.06.25 10:07, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>>> >>>> Is that actually required? >>>> The man page explicitly documents: >>>> " EINVAL A previous UFFDIO_API call already enabled one or more >>>> features for this userfaultfd. Calling UFF‐ >>>> DIO_API twice, the first time with no features set, is >>>> explicitly allowed as per the two-step feature >>>> detection handshake. >>>> " >>>> So if that doesn't work, something might be broken. >>> >>> CCing Nadav and Peter: >>> >>> Could it be that >>> >>> commit 22e5fe2a2a279d9a6fcbdfb4dffe73821bef1c90 >>> Author: Nadav Amit >>> Date: Thu Sep 2 14:58:59 2021 -0700 >>> >>> userfaultfd: prevent concurrent API initialization >>> userfaultfd assumes that the enabled features are set once and never >>> changed after UFFDIO_API ioctl succeeded. >>> However, currently, UFFDIO_API can be called concurrently from two >>> different threads, succeed on both threads and leave userfaultfd's >>> features in non-deterministic state. Theoretically, other uffd operations >>> (ioctl's and page-faults) can be dispatched while adversely affected by >>> such changes of features. >>> Moreover, the writes to ctx->state and ctx->features are not ordered, >>> which can - theoretically, again - let userfaultfd_ioctl() think that >>> userfaultfd API completed, while the features are still not initialized. >>> To avoid races, it is arguably best to get rid of ctx->state. Since there >>> are only 2 states, record the API initialization in ctx->features as the >>> uppermost bit and remove ctx->state. >>> >>> Accidentally broke the documented two-step handshake in the man page where we >>> can avoid closing + reopening the fd? >> >> I agree the code is not correct (and my patch didn’t address this issue), >> but I don’t see it broke it either. >> >> Unless I’m missing something the code before my patch, when >> uffdio_api.features == 0, also set ctx->state to UFFD_STATE_RUNNING, which >> meant another invocation would see (ctx->state != UFFD_STATE_WAIT_API) and >> fail. > > You might be right, I only checked the cmpxchg, assuming it was working > before that. > > ... but staring at the history of the "ctx->state = > UFFD_STATE_RUNNING;", I am not sure if it ever behaved that way. > > Do maybe, the man page is simply wrong (although I wonder why that case > was described that detailed) The man page was updated with commit db3d5cc1a17b0ace008ebe1eaf0ac4d96b4b519a Author: Axel Rasmussen Date: Tue Oct 3 12:45:44 2023 -0700 ioctl_userfaultfd.2: Correct and update UFFDIO_API ioctl error codes First, it is not correct that repeated UFFDIO_API calls result in EINVAL. This is true *if both calls enable features*, but in the case where we're doing a two-step feature detection handshake, the kernel explicitly expects 2 calls (one with no features set). So, correct this description. Then, some new error cases have been added to the kernel recently, and the man page wasn't updated to note these. So, add in descriptions of these new error cases. @Axel, did you ignore the automatically-set UFFD_FEATURE_INITIALIZED and the repeated calls never worked, or was there actually a time where repeated UFFDIO_API calls would not result in EINVAL? -- Cheers, David / dhildenb