From: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
To: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Liam.Howlett@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 14:54:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499ACE91-4C77-411D-A200-8AD55020BFC9@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0b65c67b24d67fd3bdb21dc35d86fe01a21b576.1773134177.git.sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
On 10 Mar 2026, at 5:49, Sayali Patil wrote:
> The charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh script assumes hugetlb cgroup memory
> interface file names use the "<size>MB" format
> (e.g. hugetlb.1024MB.current).
> This assumption breaks on systems with larger huge pages such as 1GB,
> where the kernel exposes normalized units:
> hugetlb.1GB.current
> hugetlb.1GB.max
> hugetlb.1GB.rsvd.max
> ...
>
> As a result, the script attempts to access files like
> hugetlb.1024MB.current, which do not exist when the kernel reports the
> size in GB.
>
> Normalize the huge page size and construct the pathname using the
> appropriate unit (MB or GB), matching the hugetlb controller naming.
>
> Fixes: 209376ed2a84 ("selftests/vm: make charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh work with existing cgroup setting")
> Fixes: 29750f71a9b4 ("hugetlb_cgroup: add hugetlb_cgroup reservation tests")
> Signed-off-by: Sayali Patil <sayalip@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh | 42 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> index c9fe68b6fcf9..6bec53e16e05 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh
> @@ -89,6 +89,15 @@ function get_machine_hugepage_size() {
> }
>
> MB=$(get_machine_hugepage_size)
> +if (( MB >= 1024 )); then
> + # For 1GB hugepages
> + UNIT="GB"
> + MB_DISPLAY=$((MB / 1024))
> +else
> + # For 2MB hugepages
> + UNIT="MB"
> + MB_DISPLAY=$MB
> +fi
>
> function setup_cgroup() {
> local name="$1"
> @@ -98,11 +107,12 @@ function setup_cgroup() {
> mkdir $cgroup_path/$name
>
> echo writing cgroup limit: "$cgroup_limit"
> - echo "$cgroup_limit" >$cgroup_path/$name/hugetlb.${MB}MB.$fault_limit_file
> + echo "$cgroup_limit" > \
> + $cgroup_path/$name/hugetlb.${MB_DISPLAY}${UNIT}.$fault_limit_file
MB_DISPLAY and UNIT always show up together, maybe just use a single variable
instead. But feel free to ignore this. Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Best Regards,
Yan, Zi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-10 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 9:49 [PATCH 00/13] selftests/mm: fix failures and robustness improvements Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 01/13] selftests/mm: restore default nr_hugepages value during cleanup in charge_reserved_hugetlb.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:43 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 02/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:54 ` Zi Yan [this message]
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 03/13] selftests/mm: fix hugetlb pathname construction in hugetlb_reparenting_test.sh Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:55 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 04/13] selftest/mm: fix cgroup task placement and tolerance " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 05/13] selftests/mm: size tmpfs according to PMD page size in split_huge_page_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 18:59 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 06/13] selftest/mm: adjust hugepage-mremap test size for large huge pages Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:01 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 07/13] selftest/mm: register existing mapping with userfaultfd in hugepage-mremap Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 08/13] selftests/mm: ensure destination is hugetlb-backed " Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:07 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 09/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-wp-mremap if UFFD write-protect is unsupported Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:07 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 10/13] selftests/mm: skip uffd-stress test when nr_pages_per_cpu is zero Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:08 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 11/13] selftests/mm: fix double increment in linked list cleanup in compaction_test Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:10 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 12/13] selftests/mm: move hwpoison setup into run_test() and silence modprobe output for memory-failure category Sayali Patil
2026-03-10 19:15 ` Zi Yan
2026-03-11 2:21 ` Miaohe Lin
2026-03-10 9:49 ` [PATCH 13/13] selftests/cgroup: extend test_hugetlb_memcg.c to support all huge page sizes Sayali Patil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499ACE91-4C77-411D-A200-8AD55020BFC9@nvidia.com \
--to=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sayalip@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox