linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Question about x86/mm/gup.c's use of disabled interrupts
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:14:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C17230.20109@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C16A48.4090303@redhat.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>> Disabling the interrupt will prevent the tlb flush IPI from coming 
>>>> in and flushing this cpu's tlb, but I don't see how it will prevent 
>>>> some other cpu from actually updating the pte in the pagetable, 
>>>> which is what we're concerned about here.  
>>>
>>> The thread that cleared the pte holds the pte lock and is now 
>>> waiting for the IPI.  The thread that wants to update the pte will 
>>> wait for the pte lock, thus also waits on the IPI and gup_fast()'s 
>>> local_irq_enable().  I think.
>>
>> But hasn't it already done the pte update at that point?
>>
>> (I think this conversation really is moot because the kernel never 
>> does P->P pte updates any more; its always P->N->P.)
>
> I thought you were concerned about cpu 0 doing a gup_fast(), cpu 1 
> doing P->N, and cpu 2 doing N->P.  In this case cpu 2 is waiting on 
> the pte lock.

The issue is that if cpu 0 is doing a gup_fast() and other cpus are 
doing P->P updates, then gup_fast() can potentially get a mix of old and 
new pte values - where P->P is any aggregate set of unsynchronized P->N 
and N->P operations on any number of other cpus.  Ah, but if every P->N 
is followed by a tlb flush, then disabling interrupts will hold off any 
following N->P, allowing gup_fast to get a consistent pte snapshot.

Hm, awkward if flush_tlb_others doesn't IPI...

> Won't stop munmap().

And I guess it does the tlb flush before freeing the pages, so disabling 
the interrupt helps here too.

Simplest fix is to make gup_get_pte() a pvop, but that does seem like 
putting a red flag in front of an inner-loop hotspot, or something...

The per-cpu tlb-flush exclusion flag might really be the way to go.

    J

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-18 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 19:17 Question about x86/mm/gup.c's use of disabled interrupts Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-18 21:13 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 21:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-18 21:40     ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 22:14       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-03-18 22:41         ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 22:55           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-18 23:05             ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-18 23:32               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-19  9:46                 ` Avi Kivity
2009-03-19 17:16                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-19 17:33                     ` Avi Kivity
     [not found]               ` <70513aa50903181617r418ec23s744544dccfd812e8@mail.gmail.com>
2009-03-18 23:37                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-19  1:32 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-19 17:31   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-20  4:40     ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-20 15:38       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-20 15:57         ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C17230.20109@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).