linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: why my systems never cache more than ~900 MB?
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:35:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C8FDD4.7070900@wpkg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903250220.45575.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>

Nick Piggin schrieb:
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 19:42:08 Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> On my (32 bit) systems with more than 1 GB memory it is impossible to cache
>> more than about 900 MB. Why?
>>
>> Caching never goes beyond ~900 MB (i.e. when I read a mounted drive with
>> dd):
> 
> Because blockdev mappings are limited to lowmem due to sharing their
> cache with filesystem metadata cache, which needs kernel mapped memory.
> It will >900MB of pagecache data OK (data from regular files)

Does not help me, as what interests me here on these machines is mainly 
caching block device data; they are iSCSI targets and access block 
devices directly.

(...)

>> Same behaviour on 32 bit machines with 4 GB RAM.
>>
>> No problems on 64 bit machines.
>> I have one 32 bit machine that caches beyond ~900 MB without problems.
> 
> Does it have a different user/kernel split?

Yes it does:

CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G_OPT=y


What split should I choose to enable blockdev mapping on the whole 
memory on 32 bit system with 3 or 4 GB RAM? Is it possible with 4 GB RAM 
at all?


>> Is it some kernel/proc/sys setting that I'm missing?
> 
> No, it just can't be done without changing code.


-- 
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://wpkg.org

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-24 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-24  8:42 why my systems never cache more than ~900 MB? Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-24 15:20 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 15:35   ` Tomasz Chmielewski [this message]
2009-03-24 15:42     ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-24 15:44     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-03-24 16:00       ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-03-24 16:24         ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49C8FDD4.7070900@wpkg.org \
    --to=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).