From: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mmotm boot panic bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 11:09:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b004811003051109t3215f86dy280a6317bdab9b15@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B915074.4020704@kernel.org>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 09:17 PM, Greg Thelen wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:21:41PM -0800, Greg Thelen wrote:
>>>> On several systems I am seeing a boot panic if I use mmotm
>>>> (stamp-2010-03-02-18-38). If I remove
>>>> bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch then no panic is seen. I
>>>> find that:
>>>> * 2.6.33 boots fine.
>>>> * 2.6.33 + mmotm w/o bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch: boots fine.
>>>> * 2.6.33 + mmotm (including
>>>> bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch): panics.
> ...
>>
>> Note: mmotm has been recently updated to stamp-2010-03-04-18-05. I
>> re-tested with 'make defconfig' to confirm the panic with this later
>> mmotm.
>
> please check
>
> [PATCH] early_res: double check with updated goal in alloc_memory_core_early
>
> Johannes Weiner pointed out that new early_res replacement for alloc_bootmem_node
> change the behavoir about goal.
> original bootmem one will try go further regardless of goal.
>
> and it will break his patch about default goal from MAX_DMA to MAX_DMA32...
> also broke uncommon machines with <=16M of memory.
> (really? our x86 kernel still can run on 16M system?)
>
> so try again with update goal.
>
> Reported-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> ---
> mm/bootmem.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/mm/bootmem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/bootmem.c
> +++ linux-2.6/mm/bootmem.c
> @@ -170,6 +170,28 @@ void __init free_bootmem_late(unsigned l
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> +static void * __init ___alloc_memory_core_early(pg_data_t *pgdat, u64 size,
> + u64 align, u64 goal, u64 limit)
> +{
> + void *ptr;
> + unsigned long end_pfn;
> +
> + ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat->node_id, size, align,
> + goal, limit);
> + if (ptr)
> + return ptr;
> +
> + /* check goal according */
> + end_pfn = pgdat->node_start_pfn + pgdat->node_spanned_pages;
> + if ((end_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) < (goal + size)) {
> + goal = pgdat->node_start_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat->node_id, size, align,
> + goal, limit);
> + }
> +
> + return ptr;
> +}
> +
> static void __init __free_pages_memory(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -836,7 +858,7 @@ void * __init __alloc_bootmem_node(pg_da
> return kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOWAIT, pgdat->node_id);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> - return __alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat->node_id, size, align,
> + return ___alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat, size, align,
> goal, -1ULL);
> #else
> return ___alloc_bootmem_node(pgdat->bdata, size, align, goal, 0);
> @@ -920,7 +942,7 @@ void * __init __alloc_bootmem_node_nopan
> return kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOWAIT, pgdat->node_id);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> - ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat->node_id, size, align,
> + ptr = ___alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat, size, align,
> goal, -1ULL);
> #else
> ptr = alloc_arch_preferred_bootmem(pgdat->bdata, size, align, goal, 0);
> @@ -980,7 +1002,7 @@ void * __init __alloc_bootmem_low_node(p
> return kzalloc_node(size, GFP_NOWAIT, pgdat->node_id);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_BOOTMEM
> - return __alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat->node_id, size, align,
> + return ___alloc_memory_core_early(pgdat, size, align,
> goal, ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT);
> #else
> return ___alloc_bootmem_node(pgdat->bdata, size, align,
>
On my 256MB VM, which detected the problem starting this thread, the
"double check with updated goal in alloc_memory_core_early" patch
(above) boots without panic.
My initial impression is that this fixes the reported problem. Note:
I have not tested to see if any other issues are introduced.
--
Greg
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-05 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 21:21 mmotm boot panic bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch Greg Thelen
2010-03-05 3:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-05 5:00 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 5:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 12:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-05 16:38 ` Yinghai
2010-03-05 5:17 ` Greg Thelen
2010-03-05 5:34 ` Greg Thelen
2010-03-05 18:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 19:09 ` Greg Thelen [this message]
2010-03-05 20:38 ` [PATCH] x86/bootmem: introduce bootmem_default_goal Yinghai Lu
2010-03-06 5:44 ` please don't apply : bootmem: avoid DMA32 zone by default Yinghai Lu
2010-03-07 0:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-07 0:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-07 0:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-07 1:03 ` Paul Mackerras
2010-03-07 1:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-07 9:16 ` Russell King
2010-03-05 23:58 ` mmotm boot panic bootmem-avoid-dma32-zone-by-default.patch Johannes Weiner
2010-03-06 1:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-06 2:24 ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-06 2:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 9:04 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 10:26 ` Jiri Slaby
2010-03-05 20:27 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-03-05 13:08 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b004811003051109t3215f86dy280a6317bdab9b15@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).