From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, david@kernel.org, ljs@kernel.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev, osalvador@suse.de
Cc: riel@surriel.com, liam@infradead.org, vbabka@kernel.org,
harry@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, lance.yang@linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 18:46:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49b408b9-6d10-4892-916f-ad8e7ef875e5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710055915.638659-3-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 10/07/26 11:29 am, Dev Jain wrote:
> Simplify try_to_unmap_one() by separating the hugetlb parts into
> try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one().
>
> To understand the correctness of the refactoring, the following points
> are noted:
>
> 1. try_to_unmap() is called for hugetlb folios only when they are
> hwpoisoned.
>
> 2. A hugetlb VMA cannot be mlocked.
>
> 3. page_vma_mapped_walk() returns at most one hugetlb mapping in a VMA,
> and that mapping points at the head PFN.
>
> 4. We won't ever process a softleaf entry that encodes a hugetlb folio;
> hugetlb folios are never swapped out, migration entries will be
> skipped (PVMW_MIGRATION not passed), and device-exclusive does not
> work for hugetlb.
>
> 5. The hwpoison entry is constructed from the poisoned folio, just as in
> the pre-refactor code. Any previous uffd-wp state is deliberately not
> preserved for the hwpoison entry.
>
> 6. TTU_HWPOISON is always present; for it to not be present, either the
> folio has to be in swapcache, or mapping_can_writeback() is true (see
> unmap_poisoned_folio), none of which is true for hugetlb folios.
>
> 7. Hugetlb uses separate counters from normal rss counters, therefore
> update_highwater_rss() need not be called.
>
> While at it:
>
> - Change VM_BUG_* to VM_WARN_*.
>
> - Do not declare variables which are only used once.
>
> - Constify some variables.
>
> - Add some more VM_WARN_* to assert some invariants.
>
> Except the above 4 points, no functional change intended.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
> ---
Andrew, could you squash the following diff:
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index cf02b315a2ead..b61051b879c4c 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -2229,8 +2229,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
update_hiwater_rss(mm);
/*
- * With TTU_HWPOISON, we only expect small folios or hugetlb
- * folios here for now.
+ * With TTU_HWPOISON, we only expect small folios here.
*/
if (folio_test_hwpoison(folio) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 1 +
> mm/rmap.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 4115076e4922a..bf7e163e3779d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -1271,6 +1271,7 @@ static inline void hugetlb_count_sub(long l, struct mm_struct *mm)
> }
>
> pte_t huge_ptep_get(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep);
> +unsigned long huge_pte_dirty(pte_t pte);
>
> static inline pte_t huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index dbb077f8443e3..cf02b315a2ead 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1978,6 +1978,96 @@ static inline unsigned int folio_unmap_pte_batch(struct folio *folio,
> FPB_RESPECT_WRITE | FPB_RESPECT_SOFT_DIRTY);
> }
>
> +static bool try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one(struct folio *folio,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, void *arg)
> +{
> + DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, address, 0);
> + const unsigned long hsz = huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma));
> + const enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> + struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> + bool ret = true;
> + pte_t pteval;
> +
> + /*
> + * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb folio in the case
> + * where the hugetlb folio is poisoned.
> + */
> + VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hwpoison(folio), folio);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!(flags & TTU_HWPOISON));
> +
> + range.end = vma_address_end(&pvmw);
> + mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma->vm_mm,
> + address, range.end);
> + adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &range.start, &range.end);
> + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
> +
> + /* There is only a single mapping in a VMA. */
> + if (!page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw))
> + goto range_end;
> +
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(address != pvmw.address);
> +
> + pteval = huge_ptep_get(mm, address, pvmw.pte);
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_present(pteval));
> + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(pte_pfn(pteval) != folio_pfn(folio));
> +
> + /*
> + * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page. There is no way of
> + * knowing exactly which PMDs may be cached for this mm, so we must
> + * flush them all. start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
> + * range.
> + */
> + flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
> +
> + /*
> + * To call huge_pmd_unshare, i_mmap_rwsem must be held in write mode.
> + * Caller needs to explicitly do this outside rmap routines.
> + *
> + * We also must hold hugetlb vma_lock in write mode. Lock order dictates
> + * acquiring vma_lock BEFORE i_mmap_rwsem. We can only try lock here and
> + * fail if unsuccessful.
> + */
> + if (!folio_test_anon(folio)) {
> + struct mmu_gather tlb;
> +
> + VM_WARN_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
> + if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma)) {
> + ret = false;
> + goto walk_done;
> + }
> +
> + tlb_gather_mmu_vma(&tlb, vma);
> + if (huge_pmd_unshare(&tlb, vma, address, pvmw.pte)) {
> + hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
> + huge_pmd_unshare_flush(&tlb, vma);
> + tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> + /*
> + * The PMD table was unmapped, consequently unmapping
> + * the folio.
> + */
> + goto walk_done;
> + }
> + hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
> + tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> + }
> + pteval = huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
> + if (huge_pte_dirty(pteval))
> + folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> +
> + pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(folio_page(folio, 0)));
> + hugetlb_count_sub(folio_nr_pages(folio), mm);
> + set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval, hsz);
> + hugetlb_remove_rmap(folio);
> + folio_put_refs(folio, 1);
> +
> +walk_done:
> + page_vma_mapped_walk_done(&pvmw);
> +range_end:
> + mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * @arg: enum ttu_flags will be passed to this argument
> */
> @@ -1993,7 +2083,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
> unsigned long nr_pages = 1, end_addr;
> unsigned long pfn;
> - unsigned long hsz = 0;
> int ptes = 0;
>
> /*
> @@ -2007,8 +2096,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
> /*
> * For THP, we have to assume the worse case ie pmd for invalidation.
> - * For hugetlb, it could be much worse if we need to do pud
> - * invalidation in the case of pmd sharing.
> *
> * Note that the folio can not be freed in this function as call of
> * try_to_unmap() must hold a reference on the folio.
> @@ -2016,17 +2103,6 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> range.end = vma_address_end(&pvmw);
> mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_CLEAR, 0, vma->vm_mm,
> address, range.end);
> - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> - /*
> - * If sharing is possible, start and end will be adjusted
> - * accordingly.
> - */
> - adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(vma, &range.start,
> - &range.end);
> -
> - /* We need the huge page size for set_huge_pte_at() */
> - hsz = huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma));
> - }
> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
>
> while (page_vma_mapped_walk(&pvmw)) {
> @@ -2111,66 +2187,13 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> const softleaf_t entry = softleaf_from_pte(pteval);
>
> pfn = softleaf_to_pfn(entry);
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_hugetlb(folio), folio);
> }
>
> subpage = folio_page(folio, pfn - folio_pfn(folio));
> anon_exclusive = folio_test_anon(folio) &&
> PageAnonExclusive(subpage);
>
> - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> - bool anon = folio_test_anon(folio);
> -
> - /*
> - * The try_to_unmap() is only passed a hugetlb folio
> - * in the case where the hugetlb folio contains a
> - * poisoned page.
> - */
> - VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_hwpoison(folio), folio);
> - /*
> - * huge_pmd_unshare may unmap an entire PMD page.
> - * There is no way of knowing exactly which PMDs may
> - * be cached for this mm, so we must flush them all.
> - * start/end were already adjusted above to cover this
> - * range.
> - */
> - flush_cache_range(vma, range.start, range.end);
> -
> - /*
> - * To call huge_pmd_unshare, i_mmap_rwsem must be
> - * held in write mode. Caller needs to explicitly
> - * do this outside rmap routines.
> - *
> - * We also must hold hugetlb vma_lock in write mode.
> - * Lock order dictates acquiring vma_lock BEFORE
> - * i_mmap_rwsem. We can only try lock here and fail
> - * if unsuccessful.
> - */
> - if (!anon) {
> - struct mmu_gather tlb;
> -
> - VM_BUG_ON(!(flags & TTU_RMAP_LOCKED));
> - if (!hugetlb_vma_trylock_write(vma))
> - goto walk_abort;
> -
> - tlb_gather_mmu_vma(&tlb, vma);
> - if (huge_pmd_unshare(&tlb, vma, address, pvmw.pte)) {
> - hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
> - huge_pmd_unshare_flush(&tlb, vma);
> - tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> - /*
> - * The PMD table was unmapped,
> - * consequently unmapping the folio.
> - */
> - goto walk_done;
> - }
> - hugetlb_vma_unlock_write(vma);
> - tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb);
> - }
> - pteval = huge_ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
> - if (pte_dirty(pteval))
> - folio_mark_dirty(folio);
> - } else if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
> + if (likely(pte_present(pteval))) {
> nr_pages = folio_unmap_pte_batch(folio, &pvmw, flags, pteval);
> end_addr = address + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> flush_cache_range(vma, address, end_addr);
> @@ -2211,14 +2234,8 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> */
> if (folio_test_hwpoison(folio) && (flags & TTU_HWPOISON)) {
> pteval = swp_entry_to_pte(make_hwpoison_entry(subpage));
> - if (folio_test_hugetlb(folio)) {
> - hugetlb_count_sub(folio_nr_pages(folio), mm);
> - set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval,
> - hsz);
> - } else {
> - dec_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter(folio));
> - set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
> - }
> + dec_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter(folio));
> + set_pte_at(mm, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
> } else if (likely(pte_present(pteval)) && pte_unused(pteval) &&
> !userfaultfd_armed(vma)) {
> /*
> @@ -2346,11 +2363,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(folio), -nr_pages);
> }
> discard:
> - if (unlikely(folio_test_hugetlb(folio))) {
> - hugetlb_remove_rmap(folio);
> - } else {
> - folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages, vma);
> - }
> + folio_remove_rmap_ptes(folio, subpage, nr_pages, vma);
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)
> mlock_drain_local();
> folio_put_refs(folio, nr_pages);
> @@ -2398,7 +2411,8 @@ static int folio_not_mapped(struct folio *folio)
> void try_to_unmap(struct folio *folio, enum ttu_flags flags)
> {
> struct rmap_walk_control rwc = {
> - .rmap_one = try_to_unmap_one,
> + .rmap_one = folio_test_hugetlb(folio) ?
> + try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one : try_to_unmap_one,
> .arg = (void *)flags,
> .done = folio_not_mapped,
> .anon_lock = folio_lock_anon_vma_read,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 5:59 [PATCH v2 0/5] mm/rmap: Refactor try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-07-10 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mm/rmap: convert page -> folio for hwpoison checks Dev Jain
2026-07-10 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-10 13:14 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-10 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mm/rmap: Add try_to_unmap_hugetlb_one Dev Jain
2026-07-10 13:16 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-07-10 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mm/rmap: refactor some code around lazyfree folio unmapping Dev Jain
2026-07-10 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mm/rmap: refactor anon folio unmap in try_to_unmap_one Dev Jain
2026-07-10 5:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mm/rmap: add anon folio unmap dispatcher Dev Jain
2026-07-10 12:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-10 13:13 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-11 0:35 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49b408b9-6d10-4892-916f-ad8e7ef875e5@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox