Re: [PATCH 2/6] ksm: dont allow overlap memory addresses registrations.

[Izik Eidus <ieidus@redhat.com>]

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009, Alan Cox wrote:
>   
>>> the max number of ksm pages that can be allocated at any given time so
>>> to avoid OOM conditions, like the swap-compress logic that limits the
>>> swapdevice size to less than ram.
>>>       
>
> (I don't know anything about that swap-compress logic and limitation.)
>
>   
>> Are those pages accounted for in the vm_overcommit logic, as if you
>> allocate a big chunk of memory as KSM will do you need the worst case
>> vm_overcommit behaviour preserved and that means keeping the stats
>> correct.
>>     
>
> As I understand it, KSM won't affect the vm_overcommit behaviour at all.
> Those pages Izik refers to are not allocated up front, they're just a
> limit on the number of process pages which may get held in core at any
> one time, through being shared via the KSM mechanism.
>   

Exactly, this pages are not swappable (now), so we allow the sysadmin to 
control the maximum value of them.
> KSM is not evading vm_committed_space at all, not opening a backdoor
> away from the ordinary mmaps: just collapsing duplicated pages in
> what's been mapped in the usual way, down to single copies.
>
> So the vm_commited_space accounting is exactly as before: it would
> be a bit odd to be running KSM along with OVERCOMMIT_NEVER, but it
> doesn't change its calculations at all - it will and will have to
> be as pessimistic as it ever was.
>
> The only difference would be in how much memory (mostly lowmem)
> KSM's own data structures will take up - as usual, the kernel
> data structures aren't being accounted, but do take up memory.
>
> Hugh
>   

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>