From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space V2
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:18:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0C1A41.7040202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28c262360905140609y580b6835m759dee08f08a26ab@mail.gmail.com>
Minchan Kim wrote:
> HI, Rik
>
> Thanks for careful review. :)
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>>> Now shrink_active_list is called several places.
>>> But if we don't have a swap space, we can't reclaim anon pages.
>> If swap space has run out, get_scan_ratio() will return
>> 0 for the anon scan ratio, meaning we do not scan the
>> anon lists.
>
> I think get_scan_ration can't prevent scanning of anon pages in no
> swap system(like embedded system).
> That's because in shrink_zone, you add following as
>
> /*
> * Even if we did not try to evict anon pages at all, we want to
> * rebalance the anon lru active/inactive ratio.
> */
> if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc))
> shrink_active_list(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, zone, sc, priority, 0);
That's a fair point.
How about we change this to:
if (inactive_anon_is_low(zone, sc) && nr_swap_pages >= 0)
That way GCC will statically optimize away this branch on
systems with CONFIG_SWAP=n.
Does that look reasonable?
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-14 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-14 11:11 [PATCH] mmtom: Prevent shrinking of active anon lru list in case of no swap space V2 Minchan Kim
2009-05-14 11:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 11:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 12:05 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-14 12:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-05-14 12:35 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-14 12:58 ` Rik van Riel
2009-05-14 13:09 ` Minchan Kim
2009-05-14 13:18 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2009-05-14 13:33 ` Minchan Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0C1A41.7040202@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).