From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail190.messagelabs.com (mail190.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D6F6B009D for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 05:02:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp01.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8L92Z2i015483 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:35 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8L92ZkJ1917014 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:35 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n8L92Yej002841 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:35 +0530 Message-ID: <4AB74129.90402@in.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:32:33 +0530 From: Sachin Sant MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slqb: Do not use DEFINE_PER_CPU for per-node data References: <1253302451-27740-1-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <1253302451-27740-2-git-send-email-mel@csn.ul.ie> <84144f020909200145w74037ab9vb66dae65d3b8a048@mail.gmail.com> <4AB5FD4D.3070005@kernel.org> <4AB5FFF8.7000602@cs.helsinki.fi> <4AB6508C.4070602@kernel.org> <4AB739A6.5060807@in.ibm.com> <20090921084248.GC12726@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20090921084248.GC12726@csn.ul.ie> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: Tejun Heo , Pekka Enberg , Nick Piggin , Christoph Lameter , heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Benjamin Herrenschmidt List-ID: Mel Gorman wrote: >> I applied the three patches from Mel and one from Tejun. >> > > Thanks Sachin > > Was there any useful result from Tejun's patch applied on its own? > Haven't tried with just the patch from Tejun. I will give this a try. I might not get a chance to test this until late in the evening my time. (Today being a holiday for me ) >> Tejun, the above hang looks exactly the same as the one >> i have reported here : >> >> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-September/075791.html >> >> This particular hang was bisected to the following patch >> >> powerpc64: convert to dynamic percpu allocator >> >> This hang can be recreated without SLQB. So i think this is a different >> problem. >> >> > > Was that bug ever resolved? > The bug was still present with git9(78f28b..). With latest git git10(ebc79c4 ..)i haven't tested it yet because of perf counter build errors. Thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India --------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org