linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:35:05 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AB8CB81.4080309@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090922125546.GA25965@csn.ul.ie>

Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:33:11AM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote:
>   
>> Mel Gorman wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:54:12PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Lets just keep SLQB back until the basic issues with memoryless nodes are
>>>> resolved.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> It's not even super-clear that the memoryless nodes issues are entirely
>>> related to SLQB. Sachin for example says that there was a stall issue
>>> with memoryless nodes that could be triggered without SLQB. Sachin, is
>>> that still accurate?
>>>   
>>>       
>> I think there are two different problems that we are dealing with.
>>
>> First one is the SLQB not working on a ppc64 box which seems to be specific
>> to only one machine and i haven't seen that on other power boxes.The patches
>> that you have posted seems to allow the box to boot, but eventually it hits
>> the stall issue(related to percpu dynamic allocator not working on ppc64),
>> which is the second problem we are dealing with.
>>
>>     
>
> Ok, I've sent out V3 of this. It's only a partial fix but it's about as
> far as it can be brought until the other difficulties are resolved.
>   
Thanks Mel.

>   
>> The stall issue seems to be much more critical as it is affecting almost
>> all of the power boxes that i have tested with (4 in all).
>> This issue is seen with Linus tree as well and was first seen with
>> 2.6.31-git5 (0cb583fd..) 
>>
>> The stall issue was reported here:
>> http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2009-September/075791.html
>>
>>     
>
> Can you bisect this please?
>   
The problem seems to have been introduced with
commit ada3fa15057205b7d3f727bba5cd26b5912e350f.

Specifically this patch : 
powerpc64: convert to dynamic percpu allocator

If i revert this patch i am able to boot latest git
on a powerpc box.

Thanks
-Sachin

-- 

---------------------------------
Sachin Sant
IBM Linux Technology Center
India Systems and Technology Labs
Bangalore, India
---------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-22 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-21 16:10 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Allocate per-cpu areas for node IDs for SLQB to use as per-node areas Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:17   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-21 17:24     ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-21 17:29       ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-21 17:42     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  0:01   ` Tejun Heo
2009-09-22  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] slqb: Record what node is local to a kmem_cache_cpu Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 16:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] slqb: Allow SLQB to be used on PPC Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  9:30   ` Heiko Carstens
2009-09-22  9:32     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:46 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix SLQB on memoryless configurations V2 Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 17:54   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-21 18:05     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-21 18:17       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22 10:05         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 10:21           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-09-22 10:24             ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22  5:03       ` Sachin Sant
2009-09-22 10:07         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 12:55         ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 13:05           ` Sachin Sant [this message]
2009-09-22 13:20             ` Mel Gorman
     [not found]               ` <363172900909220629j2f5174cbo9fe027354948d37@mail.gmail.com>
2009-09-22 13:38                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 23:07                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22  0:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-22  0:19   ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22  6:30     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-09-22  7:59       ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22  8:11         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-22  8:44           ` David Rientjes
2009-09-22 15:26   ` Mel Gorman
2009-09-22 17:31     ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AB8CB81.4080309@in.ibm.com \
    --to=sachinp@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).