From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C0036B004D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4ACF9E2F.3090307@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:33:51 -0400 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vmscan: separate sc.swap_cluster_max and sc.nr_max_reclaim References: <20091009174756.12B5.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091009174756.12B5.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , linux-mm List-ID: KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Rafael, Can you please review this patch series? > > I found shrink_all_memory() is not fast at all on my numa system. > I think this patch series fixes it. > > > ============================================================== > Currently, sc.scap_cluster_max has double meanings. > > 1) reclaim batch size as isolate_lru_pages()'s argument > 2) reclaim baling out thresolds > > The two meanings pretty unrelated. Thus, Let's separate it. > this patch doesn't change any behavior. > > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org