From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9870E6005A4 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:41:49 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B42606F.3000906@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:41:03 -0500 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Speculative pagefault -v3 References: <20100104182429.833180340@chello.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100104182429.833180340@chello.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "minchan.kim@gmail.com" , cl@linux-foundation.org, "hugh.dickins" , Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds List-ID: On 01/04/2010 01:24 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Patch series implementing speculative page faults for x86. Fun, but why do we need this? What improvements did you measure? I'll take a look over the patches to see whether they're sane... -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org