From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
kirill@shutemov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm] memcg use generic percpu allocator instead of private one
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:00:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B587317.6060404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100121110759.250ed739.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Thursday 21 January 2010 07:37 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:07:52 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>> This includes no functional changes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>
>>
>> Before review, could you please post parallel pagefault data on a large
>> system, since root now uses these per cpu counters and its overhead is
>> now dependent on these counters. Also the data read from root cgroup is
>> also dependent on these, could you make sure that is not broken.
>>
> Hmm, I rewrote test program for avoidng mmap_sem. This version does fork()
> instead of pthread_create() and meausre parallel-process page fault speed.
>
> [Before patch]
> [root@bluextal memory]# /root/bin/perf stat -e page-faults,cache-misses --repeat 5 ./multi-fault-fork 8
>
> Performance counter stats for './multi-fault-fork 8' (5 runs):
>
> 45256919 page-faults ( +- 0.851% )
> 602230144 cache-misses ( +- 0.187% )
>
> 61.020533723 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.002%
>
> [After patch]
> [root@bluextal memory]# /root/bin/perf stat -e page-faults,cache-misses --repeat 5 ./multi-fault-fork 8
>
> Performance counter stats for './multi-fault-fork 8' (5 runs):
>
> 46007166 page-faults ( +- 0.339% )
> 599553505 cache-misses ( +- 0.298% )
>
> 61.020937843 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.004% )
>
> slightly improved ? But this test program does some extreme behavior and
> you can't see difference in real-world applications, I think.
> So, I guess this is in error-range in famous (not small) benchmarks.
Looks good, please give me a couple of days to test, I'll revert back
with numbers and review.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir Singh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-21 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 7:18 [PATCH mmotm] memcg use generic percpu allocator instead of private one KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-20 9:37 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-20 9:47 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-20 12:46 ` Balbir Singh
2010-01-21 2:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-01-21 15:30 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B587317.6060404@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).