From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAD46B00B4 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:59:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B5F5794.8020302@cs.helsinki.fi> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:59:00 +0200 From: Pekka Enberg MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: BUG at mm/slab.c:2990 with 2.6.33-rc5-tuxonice References: <74fd948d1001261121r7e6d03a4i75ce40705abed4e0@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F52FE.5000201@crca.org.au> <1264539045.3536.1348.camel@calx> In-Reply-To: <1264539045.3536.1348.camel@calx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Matt Mackall Cc: Nigel Cunningham , Pedro Ribeiro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , "linux-mm@kvack.org >> linux-mm" List-ID: Matt Mackall wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 07:39 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. >> >> Pedro Ribeiro wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I hit a bug at mm/slab.c:2990 with .33-rc5. >>> Unfortunately nothing more is available than a screen picture with a >>> crash dump, although it is a good one. >>> The bug was hit almost at the end of a hibernation cycle with >>> Tux-on-Ice, while saving memory contents to an encrypted swap >>> partition. >>> >>> The image is here http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/9634/mmslab.jpg (150 kb) >>> >>> Hopefully it is of any use for you. Please let me know if you need any >>> more info. >> Looks to me to be completely unrelated to TuxOnIce - at least at a first >> glance. >> >> Ccing the slab allocator maintainers listed in MAINTAINERS. > > Not sure if this will do us any good, it's the second oops. Looks like slab corruption to me which is usually not a slab bug but caused by buggy callers. Is CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB enabled? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org