From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F04676B0047 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:22:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B60E6BA.8010303@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:22:02 -0500 From: Rik van Riel MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 30 of 31] transparent hugepage vmstat References: <4B5F72FF.9080204@redhat.com> <20100128010449.GE24242@random.random> In-Reply-To: <20100128010449.GE24242@random.random> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Marcelo Tosatti , Adam Litke , Avi Kivity , Izik Eidus , Hugh Dickins , Nick Piggin , Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Dave Hansen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Ingo Molnar , Mike Travis , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Christoph Lameter , Chris Wright , Andrew Morton , bpicco@redhat.com, Christoph Hellwig , KOSAKI Motohiro List-ID: On 01/27/2010 08:04 PM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:55:59PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: >> Does this have the potential to unbalance the pageout code, by >> not counting the hugepages at all? (as opposed to counting a >> hugepage as 1 page) > > When I checked it looked like this wasn't used by the pageout code. You're right. I got confused with the stats that the LRU code maintains. 31 patches is entirely too much in one review sitting :) Acked-by: Rik van Riel -- All rights reversed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org