linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: Improving OOM killer
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:49:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B698CEE.5020806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002012302.37380.l.lunak@suse.cz>

On 02/01/2010 05:02 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:

>   In other words, use VmRSS for measuring memory usage instead of VmSize, and
> remove child accumulating.

I agree with removing the child accumulating code.  That code can
do a lot of harm with databases like postgresql, or cause the
system's main service (eg. httpd) to be killed when a broken cgi
script used up too much memory.

IIRC the child accumulating code was introduced to deal with
malicious code (fork bombs), but it makes things worse for the
(much more common) situation of a system without malicious
code simply running out of memory due to being very busy.

I have no strong opinion on using RSS vs VmSize.

-- 
All rights reversed.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-03 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-01 22:02 Improving OOM killer Lubos Lunak
2010-02-01 23:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-02 21:10   ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-03  1:41     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03  1:52       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-03  2:12         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03  2:12           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-02-03  2:36             ` [patch] sysctl: clean up vm related variable declarations David Rientjes
2010-02-03  8:07               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-03  8:17               ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-03 22:54       ` Improving OOM killer Lubos Lunak
2010-02-04  0:00         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03  7:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-02-03  9:40   ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03  8:57 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-03 12:10   ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-03 12:25     ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-03 15:00       ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-03 16:06         ` Minchan Kim
2010-02-03 21:22       ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-03 14:49 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2010-02-03 17:01   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-03 18:58     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03 19:29       ` Frans Pop
2010-02-03 19:52         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03 20:12           ` Frans Pop
2010-02-03 20:26             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-03 22:55       ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-04  0:05         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-04  0:18           ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-04 21:48             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-04 22:06               ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-04 22:14                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-10 20:54                   ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-10 21:10                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-10 21:29                       ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-10 22:18                       ` Alan Cox
2010-02-10 22:31                         ` David Rientjes
2010-02-11  9:50                         ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-04 22:31               ` Frans Pop
2010-02-04 22:53                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-04  7:58           ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-04 21:34             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-10 20:54               ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-10 21:09                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-02-10 21:34                   ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-10 22:25                 ` David Rientjes
2010-02-11 10:16                   ` Lubos Lunak
2010-02-11 21:17                     ` David Rientjes
2010-02-04  9:50           ` Jiri Kosina
2010-02-04 21:39             ` David Rientjes
2010-02-05  7:35               ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-10  3:10                 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B698CEE.5020806@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=l.lunak@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).