linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:56:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B966F93.9060207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003090946180.28897@router.home>



Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 30fe668..72465c1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ struct zone {
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_hash_nr_entries;
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_bits;
>>
>> +	/* queue for processes waiting for pressure to relieve */
>> +	wait_queue_head_t	*pressure_wq;
>> +
>>  	/*
> 
> The waitqueue is in a zone? But allocation occurs by scanning a
> list of possible zones.
> 
>> +long zonepressure_wait(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, long timeout)
> 
> So zone specific.
> 
>> -		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
>> -			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
>> +		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
>> +			/* If still failing, wait for pressure on zone to relieve */
>> +			zonepressure_wait(preferred_zone, order, HZ/50);
> 
> The first zone is special therefore...
> 
> What happens if memory becomes available in another zone? Lets say we are
> waiting on HIGHMEM and memory in ZONE_NORMAL becomes available?

Do you mean the same as Nick asked or another aspect of it?
citation:
"I mean the other way around. If that zone's watermarks are not met, 
then why shouldn't it be woken up by other zones reaching their watermarks."


-- 

Grusse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-09 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 11:48 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 13:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 14:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 15:03       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:42         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 18:22           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:38             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 17:35         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:35           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:56     ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2010-03-09 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:01         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:30             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  9:53   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:08     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:23       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:36         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:11           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Put kswapd to sleep on its own waitqueue, not congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:00   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:32       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 23:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  6:39   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 10:47       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 12:15         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 14:37           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 12:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:45               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 20:09               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-16 10:11                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 14:35                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 21:35                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 11:48                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:56                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 22:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24 14:50                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 12:22                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 21:44                         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20  7:20                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20 15:32                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 17:22                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21  4:23                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21 13:19                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-22  6:21                                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                         ` Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 11:59                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 12:43                                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 14:20                                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-27 14:00                                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  9:03                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21 13:20                                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                           ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24  2:38                   ` Greg KH
2010-03-24 11:49                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 13:13                   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-12  9:09   ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B966F93.9060207@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).