From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail144.messagelabs.com (mail144.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.51]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E1B6B0093 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:07:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4B976108.1010404@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:06:16 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 1/8] numa: prep: move generic percpu interface definitions to percpu-defs.h References: <20100304170654.10606.32225.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100304170702.10606.85808.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <4B960AD0.8010709@kernel.org> <1268144009.27921.9.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> In-Reply-To: <1268144009.27921.9.camel@useless.americas.hpqcorp.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Lee Schermerhorn Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Andi Kleen , Christoph Lameter , Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , akpm@linux-foundation.org, eric.whitney@hp.com List-ID: Hello, On 03/09/2010 11:13 PM, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: >> Hmmm... I think uninlining !SMP case would be much cleaner. Sorry >> that you had to do it twice. I'll break the dependency in the percpu >> devel branch and let you know. > > OK, I'll do that for V4. It'll be one big ugly patch because of all the > dependencies. But, it's really just a mechanical change. Just in case it wasn't clear. I'm giving it a shot right now. I don't think it will be too ugly and it's something which should be done whether ugly or not. I'll let you know how it turns out. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org