From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk" <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm : remove redundant initialization of page->private
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:51:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B98AF1B.80701@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B989EE2.30803@redhat.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 04:31 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> The prep_new_page() in page allocator calls set_page_private(page, 0).
>> So we don't need to reinitialize private of page.
>>
>>
>
> Applied, thanks. Please copy the kvm mailing list in the future on kvm
> patches.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> index 741373e..9851d0e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
>> @@ -326,7 +326,6 @@ static int mmu_topup_memory_cache_page(struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache,
>> page = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!page)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - set_page_private(page, 0);
>> cache->objects[cache->nobjs++] = page_address(page);
>> }
>> return 0;
>>
>
> Jan, this is kvm-kmod unfriendly. kvm_alloc_page()?
>
Thanks for pointing out! Since which kernel can we rely on the implicit
set_page_private?
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-11 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-08 9:33 [PATCH] shmem : remove redundant code Huang Shijie
2010-03-08 16:04 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-09 2:02 ` Huang Shijie
2010-03-08 16:20 ` [PATCH] kvm : remove redundant initialization of page->private Minchan Kim
2010-03-10 10:19 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-10 14:31 ` Minchan Kim
2010-03-11 7:42 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 8:51 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-03-11 8:55 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-11 18:43 ` Hugh Dickins
2010-03-09 21:25 ` [PATCH] shmem : remove redundant code Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B98AF1B.80701@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).