Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15709] New: swapper page allocation failure

[Robert Wimmer <kernel@tauceti.net>]

I'm not really a git hero so here is what I've done:

cd /usr/src
git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git linux
cd linux
git checkout -b mykernel 0b4f2928f14c4a9770b0866923fc81beb7f4aa57

Then I've checked

drivers/net/virtio_net.c
drivers/net/smc91x.c

if the changes commited where not in there.
Next I build my kernel as usual. I used my .config
from 2.6.30 (which is working fine in a several
guests / .config see here:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25925)
and build the kernel

genkernel --menuconfig --lvm --oldconfig all

which finally gave me a 2.6.31-rc5. I should mention
that 2.6.30 was using SLUB. So here is the output
from the 2.6.31-rc5 kernel running about 20 min.:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25926

Seems not very usefull to me. I'm currently compiling
the same kernel with SLAB.

Please let me know if the git commands above are
right and/or if you need other kernel options enabled.

Thanks!
Robert

On 04/08/10 22:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 10:39:34PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> cc: mst
>>
>> On 04/08/2010 10:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>     
>>> (switched to email.  Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
>>> bugzilla web interface).
>>>
>>> On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:29:20 GMT
>>> bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
>>>
>>>    
>>>       
>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15709
>>>>
>>>>             Summary: swapper page allocation failure
>>>>             Product: Memory Management
>>>>             Version: 2.5
>>>>      Kernel Version: 2.6.32 and 2.6.33
>>>>            Platform: All
>>>>          OS/Version: Linux
>>>>                Tree: Mainline
>>>>              Status: NEW
>>>>            Severity: normal
>>>>            Priority: P1
>>>>           Component: Slab Allocator
>>>>          AssignedTo: akpm@linux-foundation.org
>>>>          ReportedBy: kernel@tauceti.net
>>>>          Regression: No
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Created an attachment (id=25903)
>>>>   -->  (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25903)
>>>> dmesg output
>>>>
>>>> I'm having problems with "swapper page allocation failure's" since upgrading
>>>> from kernel 2.6.30 to 2.6.32/2.6.33. The problems occur inside a kernel virtual
>>>> maschine (KVM). Running Gentoo with kernel 2.6.32 as host which works fine. As
>>>> long as kernel 2.6.30 is used as guest kernel the guest runs fine. But after
>>>> upgrading to 2.6.32 and 2.6.33 I get "swapper page allocation failure's" (see
>>>> attachment of dmesg output). The guest is only running a Apache webserver and
>>>> serves files from a NFS share. It has 1 GB RAM and 2 virtual CPUs. I've tried
>>>> different kernel configurations (e.g. a unmodified version from Sabayon Linux
>>>> Distribution) but doesn't help. Load of the guest (and host) is very low.
>>>> Network traffic is about 20-50 MBit/s.
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>         
>>> hm, this is a regression.
>>>
>>> : [  454.006706] users: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
>>> : [  454.006712] Pid: 7992, comm: users Not tainted 2.6.34-rc3-git6 #2
>>> : [  454.006714] Call Trace:
>>> : [  454.006717]<IRQ>   [<ffffffff8109dff7>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5c8/0x615
>>> : [  454.006796]  [<ffffffff817860ce>] ? ip_local_deliver+0x65/0x6d
>>> : [  454.006820]  [<ffffffff810c39c4>] alloc_pages_current+0x96/0x9f
>>> : [  454.006842]  [<ffffffff8167f2c7>] try_fill_recv+0x5e/0x20f
>>> : [  454.006846]  [<ffffffff8167fe13>] virtnet_poll+0x52a/0x5c7
>>> : [  454.006858]  [<ffffffff8104fe74>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x1dc/0x1f4
>>> : [  454.006873]  [<ffffffff8176035d>] net_rx_action+0xad/0x1a5
>>> : [  454.006882]  [<ffffffff8104b6cd>] __do_softirq+0x9c/0x127
>>> : [  454.006897]  [<ffffffff81008ffc>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
>>> : [  454.006901]  [<ffffffff8100af01>] do_softirq+0x41/0x7e
>>> : [  454.006904]  [<ffffffff8104b3e3>] irq_exit+0x36/0x75
>>> : [  454.006907]  [<ffffffff8100a5ee>] do_IRQ+0xaa/0xc1
>>> : [  454.006926]  [<ffffffff8183bc13>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11
>>> : [  454.006928]<EOI>   [<ffffffff81026b25>] ? kvm_deferred_mmu_op+0x5e/0xe7
>>> : [  454.006942]  [<ffffffff81026b19>] ? kvm_deferred_mmu_op+0x52/0xe7
>>> : [  454.006946]  [<ffffffff81026c03>] kvm_mmu_write+0x2e/0x35
>>> : [  454.006949]  [<ffffffff81026c7d>] kvm_set_pte_at+0x19/0x1b
>>> : [  454.006953]  [<ffffffff810aba67>] __do_fault+0x3c4/0x492
>>> : [  454.006957]  [<ffffffff810adcf4>] handle_mm_fault+0x478/0x9d8
>>> : [  454.006966]  [<ffffffff810deb59>] ? path_put+0x2c/0x30
>>> : [  454.006975]  [<ffffffff8102f162>] do_page_fault+0x2f6/0x31a
>>> : [  454.006979]  [<ffffffff8183b81e>] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x9/0xd
>>> : [  454.006982]  [<ffffffff8183bef5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30
>>> : [  454.006985] Mem-Info:
>>> : [  454.006987] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
>>> : [  454.006990] CPU    0: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
>>> : [  454.006992] CPU    1: hi:    0, btch:   1 usd:   0
>>> : [  454.006993] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
>>> : [  454.006996] CPU    0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 185
>>> : [  454.006998] CPU    1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 112
>>> : [  454.007003] active_anon:8308 inactive_anon:8544 isolated_anon:0
>>> : [  454.007005]  active_file:4882 inactive_file:205902 isolated_file:0
>>> : [  454.007006]  unevictable:0 dirty:11 writeback:0 unstable:0
>>> : [  454.007007]  free:1385 slab_reclaimable:2445 slab_unreclaimable:4466
>>> : [  454.007008]  mapped:1895 shmem:113 pagetables:1370 bounce:0
>>> : [  454.007010] Node 0 DMA free:4000kB min:60kB low:72kB high:88kB active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:11844kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15768kB mlocked:0kB dirty:0kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB slab_reclaimable:64kB slab_unreclaimable:32kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
>>> : [  454.007021] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 994 994 994
>>> : [  454.007025] Node 0 DMA32 free:1540kB min:4000kB low:5000kB high:6000kB active_anon:33232kB inactive_anon:34176kB active_file:19528kB inactive_file:811764kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:1018068kB mlocked:0kB dirty:44kB writeback:0kB mapped:7580kB shmem:452kB slab_reclaimable:9716kB slab_unreclaimable:17832kB kernel_stack:1144kB pagetables:5480kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
>>> : [  454.007036] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
>>> : [  454.007040] Node 0 DMA: 0*4kB 4*8kB 6*16kB 5*32kB 6*64kB 4*128kB 1*256kB 1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 4000kB
>>> : [  454.007050] Node 0 DMA32: 13*4kB 2*8kB 3*16kB 1*32kB 2*64kB 0*128kB 1*256kB 0*512kB 1*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1556kB
>>> : [  454.007059] 210914 total pagecache pages
>>> : [  454.007061] 0 pages in swap cache
>>> : [  454.007063] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
>>> : [  454.007065] Free swap  = 1959924kB
>>> : [  454.007067] Total swap = 1959924kB
>>> : [  454.014238] 262140 pages RAM
>>> : [  454.014241] 7489 pages reserved
>>> : [  454.014242] 21430 pages shared
>>> : [  454.014244] 247174 pages non-shared
>>>
>>> Either page reclaim got worse or kvm/virtio-net got more aggressive.
>>>
>>> Avi, Rusty: can you think of any changes in the KVM/virtio area in the
>>> 2.6.30 ->  2.6.32 timeframe which may have increased the GFP_ATOMIC
>>> demands upon the page allocator?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>    
>>>       
> On the contrary, with commit
> 3161e453e496eb5643faad30fff5a5ab183da0fe
> we should be using GFP_ATOMIC less.
> But maybe there's a bug and it has the reverse effect somehow ...
>
> Robert, could you pls try 3161e453e496eb5643faad30fff5a5ab183da0fe
> and if that *does* have the problem,
> 0b4f2928f14c4a9770b0866923fc81beb7f4aa57?
>
>   

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>