From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 779926B01F1 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:40:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BC6FBC8.9090204@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:43:04 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] change alloc function in pcpu_alloc_pages References: <9918f566ab0259356cded31fd1dd80da6cae0c2b.1271171877.git.minchan.kim@gmail.com> <20100413154820.GC25756@csn.ul.ie> <4BC65237.5080408@kernel.org> <4BC6BE78.1030503@kernel.org> <4BC6CB30.7030308@kernel.org> <4BC6E581.1000604@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Minchan Kim Cc: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Bob Liu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter List-ID: Hello, On 04/15/2010 07:21 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > kill alloc_pages_exact_node? > Sorry but I can't understand your point. > I don't want to kill user of alloc_pages_exact_node. > That's opposite. > I want to kill user of alloc_pages_node and change it with > alloc_pages_any_node or alloc_pages_exact_node. :) I see, so... alloc_pages() -> alloc_pages_any_node() alloc_pages_node() -> alloc_pages_exact_node() right? It just seems strange to me and different from usual naming convention - ie. something which doesn't care about nodes usually doesn't carry _node postfix. Anyways, no big deal, those names just felt a bit strange to me. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org