From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail203.messagelabs.com (mail203.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.243]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9E86B01EF for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2010 04:32:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BCA74D8.3030503@kernel.org> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:56:24 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] numa: x86_64: use generic percpu var numa_node_id() implementation References: <20100415172950.8801.60358.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20100415173003.8801.48519.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Lee Schermerhorn , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , Andi@domain.invalid, Kleen@domain.invalid, andi@firstfloor.org, Nick Piggin , David Rientjes , eric.whitney@hp.com, Andrew Morton , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On 04/17/2010 01:46 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Maybe provide a generic function to set the node for cpu X? Yeap, seconded. Also, why not use numa_node_id() in common.c::cpu_init()? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org