From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5B946B0203 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 03:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BECFDE9.2080301@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 15:38:17 +0800 From: Haicheng Li MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC,2/7] NUMA Hotplug emulator References: <20100513114544.GC2169@shaohui> <20100514111615.c7ca63a5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20100514054226.GB12002@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20100514054226.GB12002@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Paul Mundt Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Shaohui Zheng , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu , David Rientjes , Mel Gorman , Lee Schermerhorn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.co, fengguang.wu@intel.com, shaohui.zheng@linux.intel.com List-ID: Paul Mundt wrote: > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:16:15AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: >> On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:45:44 +0800 >> Shaohui Zheng wrote: >> >>> x86: infrastructure of NUMA hotplug emulation >>> >> Hmm. do we have to create this for x86 only ? >> Can't we live with lmb ? as >> >> lmb_hide_node() or some. >> >> IIUC, x86-version lmb is now under development. >> > Indeed. There is very little x86-specific about this patch series at all > except for the e820 bits and tying in the CPU topology. Most of what this > series is doing wrapping around e820 could be done on top of LMB, which > would also make it possible to use on non-x86 architectures. Hmm, we'll evaluate it. We'd like to make it support non-x86 archs if LMB is a feasible way. Thank you, Kame and Paul. -haicheng -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org