Re: [PATCH 1/5] rename anon_vma_lock to vma_lock_anon_vma

[Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>]

On 05/26/2010 03:25 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>
>> If you want I can send you and Andrew a duplicate of
>> what I sent this morning, with the only difference
>> being added Acked-by's.
>
> I assume this will come through Andrew, so it depends on whether he is so
> resigned to manually adding acks from following threads or not.
>
> Personally, I think it's one of the responsibilities of the person pushing
> the patch to do. Having the acked-by and reviewed-by trail should be one
> of the things that makes it _way_ easier for upstream to decide whether a
> patch should go in - especially if the people in question are active
> maintainers.

I'll do a repost, gathering up the acks I have so far.

I just saw that patches 4 and 5 have no acks yet.

I've fixed up the comments to make the code clearer and
made the "find the root anon_vma" thing a little simpler
in anon_vma_fork.

Hopefully those patches will get acks now :)

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>